Survey of management in acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
- PMID: 6971943
- PMCID: PMC1437337
Survey of management in acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
Abstract
The answers to a questionnaire concerning attitudes of members of the British Society of Gastroenterology to the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding are analysed. In the majority of cases patients were admitted to general wards under the care of physicians. Use of intensive therapy units and venous pressure monitoring varied widely. Emergency endoscopy appeared readily available and was usually the first diagnostic procedure. Double contrast radiology and emergency angiography were available in relatively few centres. Specific nonoperative treatments (angiographic and endoscopic) were scarcely employed. Most respondents agreed that elderly patients fared badly, but there was little agreement concerning other factors which influence re-bleeding or outcome. There was a wide divergence of opinion concerning the need for surgical intervention in certain hypothetical clinical situations. Despite the difficulties involved, we believe that controlled trials are necessary to improve the management of bleeding patients.
Similar articles
-
Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.Endoscopy. 2015 Oct;47(10):a1-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393172. Epub 2015 Sep 29. Endoscopy. 2015. PMID: 26417980
-
Selection of patients for early discharge or outpatient care after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage.Lancet. 1996 Apr 27;347(9009):1138-40. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90607-8. Lancet. 1996. PMID: 8609747
-
A national survey on the initial management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov-Dec;48(10):e93-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000095. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24518802
-
Diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to portal hypertension. American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee.Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jul;92(7):1081-91. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997. PMID: 9219775 Review.
-
Value of stigmata in decision-making in gastrointestinal haemorrhage.Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2000 Jun;14(3):411-25. doi: 10.1053/bega.2000.0087. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2000. PMID: 10952805 Review.
Cited by
-
Endoscopic assessment of oesophageal disease.Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Mar 28;282(6269):1074-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6269.1074-c. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981. PMID: 6783257 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Randomised trial of endoscopic argon laser photocoagulation in bleeding peptic ulcers.Gut. 1981 Mar;22(3):228-33. doi: 10.1136/gut.22.3.228. Gut. 1981. PMID: 7014392 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Management of haematemesis in a district hospital--can we do better?Postgrad Med J. 1986 Oct;62(732):907-8. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.62.732.907. Postgrad Med J. 1986. PMID: 3774721 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Massive colonic haemorrhage--the case for right hemicolectomy.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989 Jul;71(4):253-9. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989. PMID: 2672990 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Management of upper gastro-intestinal bleeding in a district general hospital.J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1986 Jul;20(3):212-5. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1986. PMID: 3488397 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical