Prospective controlled study of gastrointestinal stapled anastomoses

Abstract

A controlled prospective study was carried out in a university-affiliated community hospital to evaluate the use of gastrointestinal staples compared with conventional sutures for anastomotic construction. The study included 100 randomized cases (50 sutured and 50 stapled) requiring anastomoses. Consecutive patients were accepted into the study, and no patients were excluded. There was no significant difference between the two groups in operating room time or the duration of postoperative hospitalization, nasogastric intubation or intravenous intubation. The complication rate was similar and comparable to previously published results. On three occasions, it was necessary during operation to convert from the use of staples to sutures when immediate disruption was noted at a gastroduodenal anastomosis.