Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1981 May;13(5):891-4.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.5.891-894.1981.

Evaluation of techniques for isolation of group A streptococci from throat cultures

Comparative Study

Evaluation of techniques for isolation of group A streptococci from throat cultures

T A Kurzynski et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 May.

Abstract

In the first study, selective sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim blood agar (SXT-BA) and conventional blood agar (BA) plates incubated under CO2 and anaerobically were compared for their ability to recover group A streptococci from throat cultures. Recovery rates were: SXT-BA (anaerobic), 100%; SXT-BA (CO2), 98%; BA (anaerobic), 89.2%; and BA (CO2), 76.5%. Primary plate bacitracin test results could be read on significantly more of the SXT-BA plates. Readability rates were: SXT-BA (anaerobic), 97%; SXT-BA (CO2), 96%; BA (anaerobic), 70.6%; and BA (CO2), 32.4%. A second study compared with the SXT-BA method versus a BA-double-disk (BA-DD) method which utilizes conventional media with addition of a bacitracin differentiation and a sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim susceptibility disk placed adjacent to one another in the heavy area of inoculation. Isolation rates were: SXT-BA, 100% and BA-DD, 88%. Readability rates for direct bacitracin tests were: SXT-BA, 92% and BA-DD, 76.2%. In our hands, the SXT-BA method was superior for yielding highest isolation rates and for yielding highest readability rates of direct bacitracin test results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Jun;5(6):650-5 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Jan;9(1):144-6 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Jul;10(1):80-4 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Feb;9(2):236-8 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Sep;10(3):392-3 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources