Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1981 Jul;194(1):35-41.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-198107000-00007.

Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures. A possible factor in suture induced infection

Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures. A possible factor in suture induced infection

S Katz et al. Ann Surg. 1981 Jul.

Abstract

Surgical sutures are known to potentiate the development of wound infection. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the capability of bacteria to adhere to various types of sutures has a significant effect on their ability to cause infections. Bacterial adherence to sutures was quantitatively measured using radiolabeled bacteria. In vitro adherence assays revealed remarkable variations in the affinity of bacteria to the various sutures: nylon bound the least bacteria while bacterial adherence to braided sutures (silk, Ti-cron, Dexon) was five to eight folds higher. The degree of infection obtained in mice in the presence of different sutures nicely correlated with their adherence properties. The different removal rate of adherent bacteria (glutaraldehyde-fixed) from various sutures by the tissue factors in mice supports the hypothesis that bacterial adherence to suture materials plays a significant role in the induction of surgical infection. Our observation points out at the need for careful suture selection in contaminated wounds. The adherence properties of sutures should be considered in any future surgical suture design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Exp Pathol. 1957 Dec;38(6):573-86 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1973 Jun;177(6):679-88 - PubMed
    1. Prog Surg. 1970;8:14-37 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1967 Feb;165(2):192-9 - PubMed
    1. J Surg Res. 1968 Dec;8(12):585-92 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources