Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1980 Jun;84(3):479-88.
doi: 10.1017/s0022172400027017.

The virulence of salmonella strains for chickens: their excretion by infected chickens

The virulence of salmonella strains for chickens: their excretion by infected chickens

H Williams Smith et al. J Hyg (Lond). 1980 Jun.

Abstract

Inoculated orally, 16 Salmonella typhimurium strains belonging to 12 phage types varied greatly in their ability to kill 1-day-old chickens; variation was noted even between strains of the same phage type. Fourteen strains belonging to 11 food poisoning serotypes other than S. typhimurium were practically non-lethal when examined in this manner. All of them were lethal by the intramuscular route but some were more so than others. Two were more lethal by this route than one of the S. typhimurium strains that was highly lethal when given orally. With age, chickens rapidly became resistant to fatal infection with the food poisoning strains; given orally, a S. typhimurium strain killed 79% of 1-day-old chickens but only 3% of 2-day-old chickens. Of 2 specific poultry pathogenic strains, one, of S. gallinarum, was lethal by oral inoculation to chickens of all ages but the other, of S. pullorum, was only lethal to very young ones. Some salmonella strains, such as those of S. infantis and S. menston, were more efficient at infecting and colonizing the alimentary tract of chickens than were the more virulent S. typhimurium strains, the S. gallinarum and S. pullorum strains and a S. cholerae-suis strain.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Hyg (Lond). 1975 Oct;75(2):293-301 - PubMed
    1. J Hyg (Lond). 1975 Oct;75(2):275-92 - PubMed
    1. J Hyg (Lond). 1978 Apr;80(2):217-31 - PubMed
    1. J Comp Pathol. 1955 Jan;65(1):37-54 - PubMed
    1. J Hyg (Lond). 1952 Mar;50(1):21-36 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources