Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1982 Mar;53(3):184-8.

[Peridural anesthesia and analgesia results in general surgery]

[Article in German]
  • PMID: 7067541
Clinical Trial

[Peridural anesthesia and analgesia results in general surgery]

[Article in German]
N Frings et al. Chirurg. 1982 Mar.

Abstract

Anesthesia for major general surgery should involve the use of anesthetic techniques that might reduce the risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications. The combination of intraoperative epidural anesthesia with local anesthetics (EPA) and the use of epidural opiates for postoperative pain relief shows advantages over the application of pure general anesthesia and over postoperative systemic analgesia. Epidural opiates lead to better quality analgesia with a quicker onset and longer duration than systemical analgesics. The spirographic parameters of ventilatory function PF, FVC, FEV [1], paO2, and paCO2 decreased significantly (p less than 0.05) compared with preoperative values when systemic analgesia was performed. After epidural opiates no significant decrease could be seen. Intraoperative use of EPA has the advantages of better hemodynamic conditions and a blockade of the endocrine-metabolic response to surgery. Postoperative peridural opiates block the endocrine response as well: the serum levels of ADH and cortisol are lower than under systemic analgesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources