Comparison of two automatic blood pressure recorders and the mercury sphygomomanometer
- PMID: 7068191
- DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.4.2.329
Comparison of two automatic blood pressure recorders and the mercury sphygomomanometer
Abstract
The Physiometrics automatic blood pressure recorder was compared with the mercury sphygmomanometer in 2200 children aged 5-14 years, each reexamined after 3 and 5 years; the Physiometrics recorder produced higher intrachild correlations. In trials we could transfer what were essentially Physiometrics readings into levels similar to mercury sphygmomanometric readings by filtering out the infrasonic frequency band. The Physiometrics USM-105 was compared with its successor, the Physiometrics SR-2, on 378 children aged 10-17 years. The SR-2 measured lower than the USM-105: 4.1 mm Hg systolic and 8.5 mm Hg diastolic; differences were larger in the younger children. Both in mean levels and correlations, SR-2 readings were closer to the mercury sphygmomanometer's than were USM-105 readings, except or diastolic SR-2 readings, which were farther below the mercury sphygomomanometer 4th-phase readings than the USM-105. However, the SR-2 readings are likely closer to the true diastolic pressure in children 13 years and older, although we did not measure pressures intraarterially. Disc readings for systolic pressures showed coefficients of correlation averaging 0.96 among (n = 168) and 0.98 within (n = 40) readers for both models, but diastolic readings showed marked improvement form USM-105 (0.73, 0.81) to SR-2 (0.91, 0.97). In many of the parameters observed, SR-2 constitutes an improvement over USM-105. Automatic recorders offer certain advantages for measuring blood pressure in large-scale epidemiologic studies.
Similar articles
-
[Are automatic devices suitable for blood pressure determinations?].Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1979 Sep 1;109(33):1225-30. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1979. PMID: 493912 German.
-
Comparisons of blood pressure measurements by auscultation and Physiometrics Infrasonde recording techniques.Hypertension. 1980 Jul-Aug;2(4 Pt 2):I8-17. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.2.4_pt_2.i8. Hypertension. 1980. PMID: 7399640
-
Concurrent validity studies of blood pressure instrumentation. The Philadelphia Blood Pressure Project.Hypertension. 1984 Jan-Feb;6(1):85-91. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.6.1.85. Hypertension. 1984. PMID: 6693150 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of the Sphygmetrics SR-2 Automatic Blood Pressure Recorder to the mercury sphygmomanometer in population studies.Am J Epidemiol. 1981 Dec;114(6):836-44. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113254. Am J Epidemiol. 1981. PMID: 7315832 Clinical Trial.
-
Measuring blood pressure using the mercury sphygmomanometer.Br J Nurs. 2005 Feb 10-23;14(3):145-50. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2005.14.3.17519. Br J Nurs. 2005. PMID: 15788933 Review.
Cited by
-
Use of oscillometric devices for the measurement of blood pressure-comparison with the gold standard.Indian J Pediatr. 2012 Sep;79(9):1230-2. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0600-0. Epub 2011 Nov 5. Indian J Pediatr. 2012. PMID: 22057397
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials