Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1982 May;195(5):543-53.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-198205000-00003.

Vasopressin and splanchnic shunting. A quantitative comparison

Comparative Study

Vasopressin and splanchnic shunting. A quantitative comparison

J G Chandler. Ann Surg. 1982 May.

Abstract

To analyze the relationship between the splanchnic and systemic effects of vasopressin and to measure its efficacy in lowering portal pressure relative to what can be accomplished by zero gradient shunting, intraoperative measurements of cardiac output and relevant pressures were made in 30 patients undergoing selective or total shunts. Vasopressin caused a significant increase in systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, but an insignificant overall reduction in cardiac index (CI). However, in ten patients the decrease in CI exceeded 20%, suggesting a subpopulation of especially susceptible individuals. High initial CI, age, pre-existent heart disease, and severity of cirrhosis did not predict greater vulnerability. Adding an infusion of nitroprusside regularly reverted CI to control levels, regardless of the extent of cardiac output depression. Vasopressin was 38% as effective as a subsequent shunt in reducing splanchnic venous pressure. The portal hypotensive action bore no relationship to CI, but the pressure decrease caused by vasopressin was predictive of the reduction that could be achieved by shunting. The effects of the two types of shunts on systemic hemodynamics were minor and remarkably similar.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1962 Apr;114:458-62 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 1956 Jun;39(6):917-25 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1962 Sep;156:463-71 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 1959 Jan;45(1):72-80 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1960 Jul 30;2(7144):222-5 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources