Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-Syllable Test. I. Test reliability
- PMID: 7087416
- DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2501.135
Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-Syllable Test. I. Test reliability
Abstract
The reliability of a closed-set Nonsense-Syllable Test was determined on a group of 38 listeners with mold-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Eight randomizations of the 91-item test (four trials on each of two days) were presented monaurally, under earphones, at 90 dB SPL with a cafeteria background noise set at a +20-dB S/N ratio. Performance under these conditions ranged from 21.4 to 91.2%, reflecting the wide range of syllable-recognition ability of these subjects. Reliability of the eight measurements was determined by analysis of variance and analysis of covariance structure (parallel-test modelling) for the entire test and each of 11 subtests. Overall and individual subject results failed to show any systematic differences in scores over eight trials. Likewise, no significant differences were found in performance on individual syllables, nor were changes in the relative occurrence of specific syllable confusions noted. The test is highly reliable when evaluating hearing-impaired subjects, and thus is appropriate for use in investigations where identical items are administered under multiple experimental conditions.
Similar articles
-
Suggestions for optimizing reliability with the synthetic sentence identification test.J Speech Hear Disord. 1983 Feb;48(1):98-103. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4801.98. J Speech Hear Disord. 1983. PMID: 6621001
-
Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-syllable Test. II. Syllable recognition and consonant confusion patterns.J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Mar;25(1):141-8. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2501.141. J Speech Hear Res. 1982. PMID: 7087417
-
Consonant-recognition patterns and self-assessment of hearing handicap.J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Dec;34(6):1397-409. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3406.1397. J Speech Hear Res. 1991. PMID: 1787721
-
Nonsense-syllable recognition in noise using monaural and binaural listening strategies.J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Mar;105(3):1821-30. doi: 10.1121/1.426720. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999. PMID: 10089605
-
Features from normal and sensorineural listeners' nonsense syllable test errors.Ear Hear. 1981 May-Jun;2(3):117-21. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198105000-00006. Ear Hear. 1981. PMID: 7250560
Cited by
-
Effects of stimulus bandwidth on the imitation of ish fricatives by normal-hearing children.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Oct;51(5):1369-80. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0115). Epub 2008 Jul 29. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008. PMID: 18664693 Free PMC article.
-
Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.Trends Amplif. 1998 Mar;3(1):6-44. doi: 10.1177/108471389800300102. Trends Amplif. 1998. PMID: 25425878 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Effects of expansion on consonant recognition and consonant audibility.J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Feb;20(2):119-27. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.2.5. J Am Acad Audiol. 2009. PMID: 19927675 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of frequency compression and frequency transposition on fricative and affricate perception in listeners with normal hearing and mild to moderate hearing loss.Ear Hear. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):519-32. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000040. Ear Hear. 2014. PMID: 24699702 Free PMC article.
-
Reproducibility in Cognitive Hearing Research: Theoretical Considerations and Their Practical Application in Multi-Lab Studies.Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 16;11:1590. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01590. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32765364 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous