Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1978 Jul;21(1):185-93.
doi: 10.1128/iai.21.1.185-193.1978.

Induction of a mucosal antitoxin response and its role in immunity to experimental canine cholera

Induction of a mucosal antitoxin response and its role in immunity to experimental canine cholera

N F Pierce et al. Infect Immun. 1978 Jul.

Abstract

The induction of a jejunal antitoxin response was studied in dogs immunized with cholera toxin or toxoid. Single doses of toxoid given subcutaneously (s.c.) or of toxin given intraluminally (i.l.) were each effective in priming the mucosal immune system, whereas toxoid given i.l. was much less effective. In contrast, toxin and toxoid given i.l. were each effective as booster antigens. The local secondary response was rapid and brief, the peak occurring at about 7 days after i.l. boosting and declining by 90% after 2 more weeks. After s.c. priming and i.l. boosting with toxoid, antitoxin-containing plasma cells appeared predominantly in the portion of jejunum exposed to the i.l. booster. The appearance of antitoxin-containing plasma cells in jejunal lamina propria correlated with the amount of antitoxin recovered in jejunal washings which, in turn, correlated with protection against challenge with cholera toxin. Thus, lamina propria antitoxin-containing plasma cells appeared to be the source of protective antitoxin. However, after sequential s.c.-oral immunization with toxoid, protection against challenge with Vibrio cholerae far outlasted the major systemic and local antitoxin responses and was not obviously explained by either. These studies reveal methods for induction of a mucosal antitoxin response, but leave in question the mechanism of prolonged protection induced by s.c.-oral immunization of dogs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Jan 14;159:257-82 - PubMed
    1. J Immunol. 1963 Dec;91:724-9 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1977 Jun;135(6):888-96 - PubMed
    1. Infect Immun. 1977 Feb;15(2):360-9 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 1977 Mar;72(3):440-51 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources