Thermal stimulus thresholds: sources of variability
- PMID: 7146141
- DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(82)90026-9
Thermal stimulus thresholds: sources of variability
Abstract
Thresholds to warming and cooling by a small Peltier stimulator were measured and remeasured in 24 adults and children aged 7-9. The median thresholds to warming and cooling of the forearm were +1.04 and -.15 degrees C. respectively, and neither age nor sex mattered significantly. The test-retest correlation was significant, suggesting intra-subject reliability, despite a large range of thresholds across subjects-about an order of magnitude. Measurements of skin temperature revealed that the same stimulus can cause a greater degree of warming or cooling in one subject than another. These differences proved reliable on retesting. Surprisingly, however, there was no correlation between this physical variation among people and the size of their psychophysical thresholds. Some compensatory mechanism is suggested by these data; the implication is that people who are less responsive physically may be more sensitive neurally and vice versa.
Similar articles
-
The sensory effects of l-menthol on human skin.Somatosens Mot Res. 1992;9(3):235-44. doi: 10.3109/08990229209144774. Somatosens Mot Res. 1992. PMID: 1414120
-
Quantitative thermal perception testing in adults.J Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Sep;16(5):462-71. doi: 10.1097/00004691-199909000-00008. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1999. PMID: 10576229
-
Site-dependent and subject-related variations in perioral thermal sensitivity.Somatosens Mot Res. 2004 Sep-Dec;21(3-4):159-75. doi: 10.1080/08990220400012414. Somatosens Mot Res. 2004. PMID: 15763901
-
Reliability of cephalic thermal thresholds in healthy subjects.Cephalalgia. 1998 Oct;18(8):574-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1998.1808574.x. Cephalalgia. 1998. PMID: 9827251 Review.
-
Thermal Perception and Thermal Devices Used on Body Parts Other Than Hand or Face.IEEE Trans Haptics. 2019 Oct-Dec;12(4):386-399. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2019.2925339. Epub 2019 Jun 27. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2019. PMID: 31251195 Review.
Cited by
-
Sex differences in pain and thermal sensitivity: the role of body size.Percept Psychophys. 1991 Aug;50(2):179-83. doi: 10.3758/bf03212218. Percept Psychophys. 1991. PMID: 1945739
-
How humans adapt to hot climates learned from the recent research on tropical indigenes.J Physiol Anthropol. 2022 Jul 14;41(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40101-022-00302-3. J Physiol Anthropol. 2022. PMID: 35836266 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Individual differences in the ability to discriminate the direction of spontaneous changes in peripheral finger temperature.Biofeedback Self Regul. 1984 Dec;9(4):439-50. doi: 10.1007/BF01000561. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1984. PMID: 6537258
-
Inert gas narcosis has no influence on thermo-tactile sensation.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 May;112(5):1929-35. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2169-8. Epub 2011 Sep 20. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012. PMID: 21932070
-
Magnitude estimation of warmth: intra- and intersubject variability.Percept Psychophys. 1989 Jul;46(1):81-4. doi: 10.3758/bf03208077. Percept Psychophys. 1989. PMID: 2755765
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources