Comparative in vitro antibacterial activity of seven semi-synthetic penicillins against aerobic gram-negative bacteria and enterococci
- PMID: 7152690
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01640683
Comparative in vitro antibacterial activity of seven semi-synthetic penicillins against aerobic gram-negative bacteria and enterococci
Abstract
The MICs and MBCs of mecillinam, ticarcillin, mezlocillin, azlocillin and piperacillin were determined by the microdilution method in liquid medium using 700 strains of gram-negative bacilli and enterococci isolated from pathological sources and classified as a function of their sensitivity to ampicillin and carbenicillin. The ampicillin and carbenicillin-sensitive strains were generally sensitive to the other penicillins, although there were differences in activity. The ampicillin and carbenicillin-resistant strains of Escherichia coli that produce a TEM-type penicillinase were sensitive to mecillinam. Mezlocillin, piperacillin and azlocillin had MICs of between 32 and 64 mg/l for 40% of these strains. The Klebsiella strains, whose broad-spectrum penicillinase deactivates ampicillin and carbenicillin, remained sensitive to mecillinam. Mezlocillin, azlocillin and piperacillin had MICs of less than 8 mg/l for 50% of these strains. The carbenicillin-resistant strains of Enterobacter and Citrobacter were also resistant to the other penicillins. Piperacillin and mezlocillin displayed some activity against certain strains of carbenicillin-resistant Serratia, Proteus and Acinetobacter. Azlocillin, piperacillin and, to a lesser degree, mezlocillin were active against the strains of Pseudomonas, for which carbenicillin had an MIC of about 512 mg/l. Ampicillin, mezlocillin and azlocillin showed the best activity against the enterococci, against which mecillinam was inactive. The MBC of these antibiotics is greatly influenced by the density of the bacterial inoculum.
Similar articles
-
[Comparative in vitro activity of 5 semi-synthetic penicillins against aerobic Gram-negative bacilli and enterococci (author's transl)].Nouv Presse Med. 1982 Feb 4;11(5 Pt 2):318-23. Nouv Presse Med. 1982. PMID: 6460967 French.
-
In vitro activity of piperacillin compared with that of ampicillin, ticarcillin, azlocillin, and mezlocillin.Arzneimittelforschung. 1980;30(2):304-7. Arzneimittelforschung. 1980. PMID: 6445735
-
Azlocillin and mezlocillin: new ureido penicillins.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Jun;13(6):930-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.13.6.930. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978. PMID: 677860 Free PMC article.
-
Azlocillin, mezlocillin, and piperacillin: new broad-spectrum penicillins.Ann Intern Med. 1982 Nov;97(5):755-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-5-755. Ann Intern Med. 1982. PMID: 6215872 Review.
-
The acylampicillins: mezlocillin, piperacillin, and azlocillin.Rev Infect Dis. 1984 Jan-Feb;6(1):13-32. doi: 10.1093/clinids/6.1.13. Rev Infect Dis. 1984. PMID: 6369480 Review.
Cited by
-
In vitro antibacterial effects of cephalosporins.Drugs. 1987;34 Suppl 2:44-63. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198700342-00006. Drugs. 1987. PMID: 3319505 Review.
-
Assessing Clinical Potential of Old Antibiotics against Severe Infections by Multi-Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Using In Silico Modelling.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Nov 30;15(12):1501. doi: 10.3390/ph15121501. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36558952 Free PMC article. Review.