Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1982 Apr;1(2):91-6.
doi: 10.1007/BF02014198.

Diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia by coagglutination and counterimmunoelectrophoresis of sputum samples

Diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia by coagglutination and counterimmunoelectrophoresis of sputum samples

M Kalin et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr.

Abstract

A comparison was made of the methods of coagglutination (using sensitized staphylococci) and counterimmunoelectrophoresis with regard to (i) sensitivity in detecting capsular polysaccharides from 14 different types of pneumococci, and (ii) sensitivity and specificity in detecting pneumococcal antigen in sputum samples from patients with pneumonia. Counterimmunoelectrophoresis was 20-150 times less sensitive than coagglutination in detecting purified type 7F and 14 polysaccharide preparations, and was as sensitive as or slightly more sensitive than coagglutination in detecting the other 12 polysaccharide types. Of 331 sputum samples examined, 94 were antigen positive, 87 by coagglutination and 76 by counterimmunoelectrophoresis; strong reactions were obtained with 85 and 63 samples, respectively. Moreover, with counterimmunoelectrophoresis 24 samples gave rise to probably non-specific precipitates, while with coagglutination either a strong positive or an unequivocally negative result was obtained in all but six samples. It is concluded that coagglutination is not only simpler and faster than counterimmunoelectrophoresis, but also appears to be more specific and sensitive for the detection of pneumococcal antigen in sputum samples.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979 Mar;119(3):345-8 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1975 Feb;28(2):118-23 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 May;11(5):488-91 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1975 Oct;28(10):801-6 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Infect Dis. 1983;15(2):153-60 - PubMed

Substances