The stapled gastrointestinal tract anastomosis: incidence of postoperative complications compared with the sutured anastomosis
- PMID: 718296
- PMCID: PMC1396764
- DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197811000-00019
The stapled gastrointestinal tract anastomosis: incidence of postoperative complications compared with the sutured anastomosis
Abstract
Performance of gastrointestinal anastomosis by means of surgical stapling devices has achieved popularity in the last decade even though no detailed study has been reported comparing complications following the stapled anastomosis with those following hand sutured procedures performed by the same surgeons. We have reviewed 812 operative procedures on the gastrointestinal tract performed in one hospital over a four year period. Stapled anastomoses were performed in 472 with 13 (2.8%) complications related to the anastomosis; in 296 sutured anastomoses there were nine (3.0%) related complications. Comparison did not disclose any significant difference in the number of complications in these two groups. In 44 instances wherein the anastomosis contained both staples and sutures, there were no related complications. Further analysis of the patients in each group disclosed that stapling procedures were utilized in a much higher percentage of those operations which were performed under emergency conditions or in the presence of intra-abdominal sepsis, intestinal obstruction, and carcinomatosis. If the technical details of surgical stapling are mastered, this technique appears to be as safe as suturing in the performance of anastomoses in the gastrointestinal tract.
Similar articles
-
Stapled versus sutured gastrointestinal anastomoses in the trauma patient.J Trauma. 1999 Sep;47(3):500-7; discussion 507-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199909000-00011. J Trauma. 1999. PMID: 10498304
-
Stapled versus sutured gastrointestinal anastomoses in the trauma patient: a multicenter trial.J Trauma. 2001 Dec;51(6):1054-61. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200112000-00005. J Trauma. 2001. PMID: 11740250
-
[Surgical treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus: automatic suture versus manual suture].Arq Gastroenterol. 1982 Jul-Sep;19(3):113-9. Arq Gastroenterol. 1982. PMID: 6764358 Portuguese.
-
[Use of surgical staplers on the upper gastrointestinal tract].Zentralbl Chir. 1993;118(8):440-5. Zentralbl Chir. 1993. PMID: 8379262 Review. German.
-
Is "functional end-to-end anastomosis" really functional? A review of the literature on stapled anastomosis using linear staplers.Surg Today. 2017 Jan;47(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1321-9. Epub 2016 Mar 17. Surg Today. 2017. PMID: 26988855 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the mechanical strength and patency of functional end-to-end anastomoses.Surg Endosc. 2007 Sep;21(9):1508-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9131-6. Epub 2007 Feb 7. Surg Endosc. 2007. PMID: 17285383
-
Influence of stapler type on in vitro leakage pressures and location of functional end-to-end stapled anastomoses.Can J Vet Res. 2022 Apr;86(2):113-115. Can J Vet Res. 2022. PMID: 35388226 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of tissue compression on circular stapler line failure.Surg Endosc. 2011 Sep;25(9):3043-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1667-4. Epub 2011 Apr 13. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 21487874
-
Cyanoacrylate for colonic anastomosis; is it safe?Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 May;25(5):601-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0872-2. Epub 2010 Jan 12. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010. PMID: 20066535
-
Usefulness of the one-step technique in functional end-to-end anastomosis for colonic surgery: results of a prospective multicentre cohort study from the Japanese KYCC group.Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jul 9;28(1):82. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02958-8. Tech Coloproctol. 2024. PMID: 38981897
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources