Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1980 May 17;280(6225):1203-6.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6225.1203.

Screening for the small-for-dates fetus: a two-stage ultrasonic examination schedule

Screening for the small-for-dates fetus: a two-stage ultrasonic examination schedule

J P Nielson et al. Br Med J. .

Abstract

To find an effective routine screening method for small-for-dates fetuses 474 women with singleton pregnancies participated in a two-stage ultrasonic examination schedule. At the first-stage examination, which was conducted in early pregnancy, fetal crown-rump length or biparietal diameter was measured for an accurate assessment of gestational age, which was essential for interpreting the results of the second-stage examination. The second-stage examination was performed at 34-36 weeks and entailed measuring seven fetal variables, the results of which were assessed singly and in combination after delivery to identify the best indicator of small-for-dates fetuses. Fetal head measurements proved to be the least sensitive indicators of growth retardation, correctly identifying only 56-59% of cases. Measurements of trunk area and circumference, however, correctly identified 81% and 83% of cases respectively, but the most effective screening index was the product of crown-rump length and trunk area: with this index 34 out of 36 small-for-dates fetuses (94%) were correctly identified. Calculating the product of crown-rump length and trunk area from ultrasonic displays is quick and simple, and combined with the first-stage examination is a highly reliable screening method for small-for-dates fetuses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1967 Oct;74(5):675-7 - PubMed
    1. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1968 Sep;75(9):903-16 - PubMed
    1. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1969 Jul;76(7):603-9 - PubMed
    1. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1968 May;75(5):568-76 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1971 Nov;2(7732):1002-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources