Screening for the small-for-dates fetus: a two-stage ultrasonic examination schedule
- PMID: 7190048
- PMCID: PMC1601481
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.280.6225.1203
Screening for the small-for-dates fetus: a two-stage ultrasonic examination schedule
Abstract
To find an effective routine screening method for small-for-dates fetuses 474 women with singleton pregnancies participated in a two-stage ultrasonic examination schedule. At the first-stage examination, which was conducted in early pregnancy, fetal crown-rump length or biparietal diameter was measured for an accurate assessment of gestational age, which was essential for interpreting the results of the second-stage examination. The second-stage examination was performed at 34-36 weeks and entailed measuring seven fetal variables, the results of which were assessed singly and in combination after delivery to identify the best indicator of small-for-dates fetuses. Fetal head measurements proved to be the least sensitive indicators of growth retardation, correctly identifying only 56-59% of cases. Measurements of trunk area and circumference, however, correctly identified 81% and 83% of cases respectively, but the most effective screening index was the product of crown-rump length and trunk area: with this index 34 out of 36 small-for-dates fetuses (94%) were correctly identified. Calculating the product of crown-rump length and trunk area from ultrasonic displays is quick and simple, and combined with the first-stage examination is a highly reliable screening method for small-for-dates fetuses.
Similar articles
-
Screening for small for dates fetuses: a controlled trial.Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Nov 3;289(6453):1179-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6453.1179. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984. PMID: 6437476 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Detection of the small-for-dates twin fetus by ultrasound.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981 Jan;88(1):27-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1981.tb00932.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981. PMID: 7459288
-
Product of fetal crown-rump length and trunk area: ultrasound measurement in high-risk pregnancies.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Aug;91(8):756-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb04845.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984. PMID: 6466578
-
Fetal biometry: relevance in obstetrical practice.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;55(1):281-7. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182446e9b. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22343244 Review.
-
Nontraditional sonographic pearls in estimating gestational age.Semin Perinatol. 2008 Jun;32(3):154-60. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2008.02.003. Semin Perinatol. 2008. PMID: 18482614 Review.
Cited by
-
Screening for small for dates fetuses: a controlled trial.Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Nov 3;289(6453):1179-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6453.1179. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984. PMID: 6437476 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Can fundal height predict birth weight or twins?Can Fam Physician. 1986 Jan;32:55-60. Can Fam Physician. 1986. PMID: 21274242 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources