Sensation of rotation about a vertical axis with a fixed visual field in different illuminations and in the dark
- PMID: 7202613
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00236606
Sensation of rotation about a vertical axis with a fixed visual field in different illuminations and in the dark
Abstract
This paper compares the motion sensations of a subject rotated about a vertical axis for two fixed visual fields (a large peripheral field and a single central spot) and in darkness. Motion sensation is described in terms of threshold, frequency response, and subjective displacement and velocity. The perception of angular acceleration showed significantly lower threshold and reduced latency time for the illuminated presentation. The level of illumination, however, produced no significant difference in threshold. The subjective frequency response, measured by a nulling method, showed a higher gain in the illuminated presentation, particularly at low frequencies and accelerations. With the subject rotating a pointer to maintain a fixed heading during triangular velocity stimuli, subjective displacements showed no difference for all different visual cues. Magnitude estimates of the after-rotation associated with deceleration from a constant velocity showed a quicker rising speed, larger subjective velocity and longer duration in the illuminated presentation. All the results suggest that the oculogyral illusion is principally responsible for producing a lower threshold in the illuminated presentation, although the fixed peripheral visual field tends to reduce reliance upon vestibular signals. At lower intensity rotation stimuli, this effect is especially apparent.
Similar articles
-
Influence of combined visual and vestibular cues on human perception and control of horizontal rotation.Exp Brain Res. 1981;41(2):159-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00236605. Exp Brain Res. 1981. PMID: 6970678
-
Visual display lowers detection threshold of angular, but not linear, whole-body motion stimuli.Aviat Space Environ Med. 1989 Jul;60(7):629-33. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1989. PMID: 2764843
-
Flash induced afterimage versus single spot visual object influence on visual-vestibular interaction in detection threshold for self-motion perception.Neurosci Lett. 2014 Apr 3;564:43-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Feb 11. Neurosci Lett. 2014. PMID: 24530257
-
The effect of a moving foveal target on the subjective sensation of motion.Biol Cybern. 1981;40(2):93-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00344288. Biol Cybern. 1981. PMID: 7236756
-
Thresholds for self-motion perception in roll without and with visual fixation target--the visualvestibular interaction effect.Funct Neurol. 2015 Apr-Jun;30(2):99-104. doi: 10.11138/fneur/2015.30.2.099. Funct Neurol. 2015. PMID: 26415781 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Self-motion sensation influenced by visual fixation.Percept Psychophys. 1984 Mar;35(3):279-85. doi: 10.3758/bf03205942. Percept Psychophys. 1984. PMID: 6728627 No abstract available.
-
Temporal processing of self-motion: modeling reaction times for rotations and translations.Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jul;228(1):51-62. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3536-y. Epub 2013 May 12. Exp Brain Res. 2013. PMID: 23665749 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived orientation, motion, and configuration of the body during viewing of an off-vertical, rotating surface.Percept Psychophys. 1986 Jan;39(1):39-46. doi: 10.3758/bf03207582. Percept Psychophys. 1986. PMID: 3703660 No abstract available.
-
Role of vestibular and neck inputs for the perception of object motion in space.Exp Brain Res. 1992;89(3):655-68. doi: 10.1007/BF00229890. Exp Brain Res. 1992. PMID: 1644128
-
Influence of combined visual and vestibular cues on human perception and control of horizontal rotation.Exp Brain Res. 1981;41(2):159-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00236605. Exp Brain Res. 1981. PMID: 6970678