This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comparative Study

. 1980 Nov;28(5):390-7.

doi: 10.3758/bf03204882.

Three-stimulus procedures in olfactory psychophysics: an experimental comparison of Thurstone-Ura and three-alternative forced-choice models of signal detection theory

PMID: 7208248
DOI: 10.3758/bf03204882

Comparative Study

Three-stimulus procedures in olfactory psychophysics: an experimental comparison of Thurstone-Ura and three-alternative forced-choice models of signal detection theory

J E Frijters. Percept Psychophys. 1980 Nov.

. 1980 Nov;28(5):390-7.

doi: 10.3758/bf03204882.

Author

PMID: 7208248
DOI: 10.3758/bf03204882

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers.
Jäkel F, Wichmann FA. Jäkel F, et al. J Vis. 2006 Nov 10;6(11):1307-22. doi: 10.1167/6.11.13. J Vis. 2006. PMID: 17209737
A comparison of sniff bottle staircase and olfactometer-based threshold tests.
Hayes JE, Jinks AL, Stevenson RJ. Hayes JE, et al. Behav Res Methods. 2013 Mar;45(1):178-82. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0220-2. Behav Res Methods. 2013. PMID: 22836949
Detecting gustatory-olfactory flavor mixtures: models of probability summation.
Marks LE, Veldhuizen MG, Shepard TG, Shavit AY. Marks LE, et al. Chem Senses. 2012 Mar;37(3):263-77. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjr103. Epub 2011 Nov 10. Chem Senses. 2012. PMID: 22075720 Free PMC article.
Modern psychophysical tests to assess olfactory function.
Eibenstein A, Fioretti AB, Lena C, Rosati N, Amabile G, Fusetti M. Eibenstein A, et al. Neurol Sci. 2005 Jul;26(3):147-55. doi: 10.1007/s10072-005-0452-3. Neurol Sci. 2005. PMID: 16086127 Review.
Measuring smells.
Haddad R, Lapid H, Harel D, Sobel N. Haddad R, et al. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Aug;18(4):438-44. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.09.007. Epub 2008 Oct 3. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008. PMID: 18824102 Review.

See all similar articles

Cited by

A transfer of technology from engineering: use of ROC curves from signal detection theory to investigate information processing in the brain during sensory difference testing.
Wichchukit S, O'Mahony M. Wichchukit S, et al. J Food Sci. 2010 Nov-Dec;75(9):R183-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01863.x. J Food Sci. 2010. PMID: 21535617 Free PMC article. Review.

References

1. J Air Pollut Control Assoc. 1975 Jan;25(1):28-35 - PubMed
1. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 Feb;5(1):146-56 - PubMed

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Other Literature Sources
- The Lens - Patent Citations Database