Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1981 Feb;22(2):126-9.
doi: 10.1136/gut.22.2.126.

Manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence

Manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence

D M Matheson et al. Gut. 1981 Feb.

Abstract

Sixty-three patients with complete rectal prolapse and/or faecal incontinence have undergone anal manometry and the results have been compared with an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls. Maximal basal pressure (MBP) and maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) were measured before and at four months and a year after treatment. The anal pressures of normal subjects are presented. Patients with rectal prolapse alone had normal anal pressures, whereas patients with incontinence with or without prolapse had significantly lower basal and squeeze pressures than controls. Successful surgical treatment of prolapse or incontinence did not produce significant change in anal canal pressures, whereas the combination of pelvic floor exercises and a continence aid was associated with a significant rise in MSP.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lancet. 1966 Feb 5;1(7432):297-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1966 Sep;53(9):784-7 - PubMed
    1. J Neurol Sci. 1969 Sep-Oct;9(2):321-46 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1972 Nov;59(11):841-6 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1975 Sep;18(6):470-2 - PubMed