Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1981 May;38(2):130-7.
doi: 10.1136/oem.38.2.130.

Mortality of workers certified by pneumoconiosis medical panels as having asbestosis

Mortality of workers certified by pneumoconiosis medical panels as having asbestosis

G Berry. Br J Ind Med. 1981 May.

Abstract

A mortality study has been carried out at the London, Cardiff, or Swansea Pneumoconiosis Medical Panels between 1952 and 1976 on people certified as suffering from asbestosis. The main analysis was of 665 men, 283 of whom had died. Of the deaths, 39% were from lung cancer, 9% mesothelioma, and 20% asbestosis. The observed mortality was compared with expectation based on the death rates for England and Wales. For all causes the observed number of deaths was 2.6 times expectation and for lung cancer 9.1 times expectation. After 10 years from first certification half of the men had died compared with an expectation of one in four. The excess death rates were apparent in the first year after certification and were still operating after 10 years on those who survived until then. The main factor influencing the mortality was the clinical state of the men at the time of certification, as indicated by the percentage disability awarded; the excess lung cancer rate and the mesothelioma and asbestosis rates all increased with percentage disability. Those awarded only 10% or 20% benefit were still at risk from all the three asbestos-related causes. For a man certified at age 55 it was estimated that his life expectation would be reduced by 3, 5, 8, or 12 years according to whether his rate of disablement benefit was 10%, 20%, 30% or 40% , or 50% or more respectively.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Ind Med. 1979 May;36(2):98-112 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1979 Aug 3;242(5):458-9 - PubMed
    1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1965 Dec 31;132(1):128-38 - PubMed
    1. IARC Sci Publ. 1980;(30):603-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Ind Med. 1979 Nov;36(4):281-91 - PubMed