Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1981 Jul;88(7):711-7.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1981.tb01270.x.

Comparison of epidural and intramuscular pethidine for analgesia in labour

Comparative Study

Comparison of epidural and intramuscular pethidine for analgesia in labour

R P Husemeyer et al. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981 Jul.

Abstract

Analgesia mediated by a direct spinal action of narcotic drugs administered via the epidural route may have considerable advantages over conventional(conduction block) epidural analgesia in labour. The efficacy, mode of action and placental transfer of epidurally administered narcotics in labour has not yet been established. We have compared the systemic absorption, analgesia and other effects on the mothers and transfer of drug to the fetus in primigravidae who received epidural or intramuscular pethidine 100 mg in labour. The superior analgesia following epidural pethidine did not appear to be attributable to a selective spinal action but rather to higher plasma concentrations of pethidine together with a possible weak regional conduction block due to local anaesthetic action of 1% pethidine solution. Epidural pethidine is not an advantageous method for providing analgesia in labour.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources