Average multichannel EEG potential fields evoked from upper and lower hemi-retina: latency differences
- PMID: 72652
- DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(77)90087-6
Average multichannel EEG potential fields evoked from upper and lower hemi-retina: latency differences
Abstract
Checkerboard reversals shown to the upper hemiretina evoke EEG potentials which in anterior-posterior derivations are approximately inverted in polarity compared with potentials evoked by lower hemiretinal stimulation. Using a 48-channel system, EEG scalp field distributions of such responses were mapped. Examination of the map sequences shows that occipital positive maximal field values start to develop at about the same time in the two stimulus conditions, but peak much earlier and somewhat more anteriorly for upper than for lower hemiretinal stimulation. Thus, there is a difference of response latency in the two conditions, which accounts for the approximate inversion of polarity. Possible correlations with reports of higher receptor cell density, higher visual acuity, and shorter motor reaction time of the upper hemiretinal system are noted.
Similar articles
-
Monocular and binocular evoked average potential field topography: upper and lower hemiretinal stimuli.Exp Brain Res. 1983;50(2-3):341-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00239198. Exp Brain Res. 1983. PMID: 6641866
-
Multichannel evoked potential fields show different properties of human upper and lower hemiretina systems.Exp Brain Res. 1979 Mar 9;35(1):151-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00236791. Exp Brain Res. 1979. PMID: 436986
-
The polarity inversion of scalp potentials evoked by upper and lower half-field stimulus patterns: latency or surface distribution differences?Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1979 Apr;46(4):409-15. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(79)90142-1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1979. PMID: 85537
-
Scalp potential fields evoked by grating stimuli: effects of spatial frequency and orientation.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984 Oct;58(4):325-32. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(84)90058-0. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984. PMID: 6207001
-
Generators of visual evoked potentials investigated by dipole tracing in the human occipital cortex.Neuroscience. 1998 Jun;84(3):723-39. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00569-1. Neuroscience. 1998. PMID: 9579779 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Visual field asymmetries in visual evoked responses.J Vis. 2014 Dec 19;14(14):13. doi: 10.1167/14.14.13. J Vis. 2014. PMID: 25527151 Free PMC article.
-
Topographic visually evoked potentials induced by stereoptic stimulus.Br J Ophthalmol. 1985 Aug;69(8):612-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.69.8.612. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985. PMID: 4016060 Free PMC article.
-
Monocular and binocular evoked average potential field topography: upper and lower hemiretinal stimuli.Exp Brain Res. 1983;50(2-3):341-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00239198. Exp Brain Res. 1983. PMID: 6641866
-
Event-related potential components N1, P2 and P3 to rare and frequent stimuli in intellectually impaired neurological patients.Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1991;240(4-5):240-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02189533. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1991. PMID: 1828998
-
Quantitative electroencephalograms and neuro-optometry: a case study that explores changes in electrophysiology while wearing therapeutic eyeglasses.Neurophotonics. 2017 Jan;4(1):011013. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.4.1.011013. Epub 2017 Mar 15. Neurophotonics. 2017. PMID: 28386574 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources