Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement
- PMID: 7267140
- DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(81)90199-8
Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement
Abstract
Chronic pain patients reported pain intensity on each of 3 pain intensity scales, the visual analog, numerical and adjectival scales, and then ranked the scales in order of perceived best communication of pain intensity. All patients were able to complete an adjectival scale but 11% were unable to complete a visual analog scale and 2% failed at a numeric scale. The intensity of the pain ratings on the 3 scales were significantly correlated and there were no reliable differences in reported intensity as a function of preference. Pain intensity was reliably higher on each scale for depressed-anxious patients as compared to non-depressed/non-anxious patients. Patients completing all 3 scales indicated a significant preference for the adjectival scale but the basis for this preference did not appear related to sex, etiology of pain, affective variables nor selected psychological variables. These data indicate that pain scale preference does not influence pain intensity report. Nevertheless, there are some clinical situations in which a numeric scale is likely to yield a better measure of pain intensity.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of Pain Intensity Assessment Tools Among Elderly Patients With Cancer in Taiwan.Cancer Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;40(4):269-275. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000410. Cancer Nurs. 2017. PMID: 27333129
-
Pain intensity assessment in older adults: use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults.Clin J Pain. 2004 Jul-Aug;20(4):207-19. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200407000-00002. Clin J Pain. 2004. PMID: 15218405
-
Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults.Pain Med. 2007 Apr;8(3):223-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00296.x. Pain Med. 2007. PMID: 17371409
-
Assessment of pain.Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen103. Epub 2008 May 16. Br J Anaesth. 2008. PMID: 18487245 Review.
-
Pain measurement in arthritis.Arthritis Care Res. 1993 Dec;6(4):178-86. doi: 10.1002/art.1790060404. Arthritis Care Res. 1993. PMID: 7918713 Review.
Cited by
-
Cross-cultural adaptation, evaluation and validation of the Spouse Response Inventory: a study protocol.BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 14;4(10):e005119. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005119. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 25763793 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic Liver Retraction Decreases Postoperative Pain and Length of Stay in Bariatric Surgery Compared to Nathanson Device.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Feb;31(2):194-202. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0388. Epub 2020 Jul 14. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021. PMID: 32678701 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of the Hanyang Pain Scale for clerical workers with musculoskeletal pain.J Pain Res. 2016 Apr 8;9:207-13. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S102778. eCollection 2016. J Pain Res. 2016. PMID: 27114717 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating preference-based EQ-5D health state utilities or item responses from neuropathic pain scores.Patient. 2012;5(3):185-97. doi: 10.1007/BF03262491. Patient. 2012. PMID: 22765255
-
NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy.Gut. 2002 May;50(5):604-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.5.604. Gut. 2002. PMID: 11950803 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical