Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1981 Jun;17(2):182-97.

[Evaluation of the methylthymol blue and orthocresolphthalein direct methods of determination of serum calcium]

[Article in Italian]
  • PMID: 7267981
Comparative Study

[Evaluation of the methylthymol blue and orthocresolphthalein direct methods of determination of serum calcium]

[Article in Italian]
M Besozzi et al. Quad Sclavo Diagn. 1981 Jun.

Abstract

Two methods for the direct colorimetric determination of serum calcium (BMT and OCFT) have been evaluated and compared with atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). Both colorimetric methods resulted simple to use, but temperature-sensitive: values for the ratio absorbance at 10 degrees C/absorbance at 45 degrees C were 1.6 (BMT) and 1.8 (OCFT). When readings were taken at 37 degrees C good precision was achieved with both methods (between-the-series coefficients of variation were 3.5 divided by 2.2% for OFCT and 1.9 divided by 3.4% for BMT). No interference from bilirubin (up to 180 mumol/l) was observed with both methods; slight positive interference from haemoglobin (1 g/l) was observed only with OCFT method. Results from the two colorimetric methods closely agreed in the range 1.0 divided by 4.5 mmol/l: statistical analysis of comparison data gave BMT = 0.0963 + 0.9521 OCFT, r = 0.9820. From the results of direct comparison with AAS (103 serum specimens, concentration spanning from 1.0 to 4.5 mmol/l) statistical analysis gave: BMT (y)/AAS(x): y = 0.0721 + 1.0226x (r = 0.9678); OCFT(y)AAS(x): y = -0.0208 + 1.0720x (r = 0.9836): it is concluded that both methods show a slight positive bias with respect to AAS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles