Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1981;29(3):281-8.

[Analysis of the results of the trial where groups have been randomized. The Paris cardiovascular prevention trial (author's transl)]

[Article in French]
  • PMID: 7302311

[Analysis of the results of the trial where groups have been randomized. The Paris cardiovascular prevention trial (author's transl)]

[Article in French]
F Cambien et al. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1981.

Abstract

In a prevention trial, when the randomised units are groups of subjects, the first step in the analysis of the results is to check whether the groups differ, for the variables under study, ie, to test a possible group effect. If this effect is not significant, the results are analysed as if the subjects had been randomised. On the other hand, it this effect is significant, the comparison must be carried out between the groups and no more between the subjects. In the latter case, the loss of efficiency of the randomization of groups instead of the randomization of subjects can be computed. When a group effect is present and the number of subjects in each group differs, the analysis is considerably more complex. In the Paris cardiovascular prevention trial, 160 groups of young men, with variable numbers of subjects in each group have been randomised. The change in weight, blood cholesterol and cigarette consumption after two years of intervention are analysed in the present paper with the methodological principles mentioned above.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types