Chance and consensus in peer review
- PMID: 7302566
- DOI: 10.1126/science.7302566
Chance and consensus in peer review
Abstract
An experiment in which 150 proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation were evaluated independently by a new set of reviewers indicates that getting a research grant depends to a significant extent on chance. The degree of disagreement within the population of eligible reviewers is such that whether or not a proposal is funded depends in a large proportion of cases upon which reviewers happen to be selected for it. No evidence of systematic bias in the selection of NSF reviewers was found.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
