Similar articles

• Clinical experiences with Telebrix and Hexabrix in angiography.

  Bohutová J, Kolár J, Karmazin V, Stupákova Z. Bohutová J, et al. Radiol Diagn (Berl). 1983;24(2):197-202. Radiol Diagn (Berl). 1983. PMID: 6683857 No abstract available.
• Haemodynamic side effects of meglumine ioglicate, meglumine sodium ioxaglate and iohexol in aortofemoral angiography: comparison of a high-osmolar and two low-osmolar radiological contrast media.

  Wiebe V, Straub H. Wiebe V, et al. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd. 1983;118:78-84. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd. 1983. PMID: 6139084 No abstract available.
• [Adverse reactions following high-dose intravenous injection of urographic contrast media].

  Lackner K, Köster O, von Uexküll V, Broich H. Lackner K, et al. Rofo. 1984 Oct;141(4):447-52. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1053167. Rofo. 1984. PMID: 6436920 German.
• [Diagnostic effectiveness and safety of currently available X-ray contrast media].

  Sergeev PV, Sviridov NK, Poliaev IuA, Shimanovskiĭ NL. Sergeev PV, et al. Vestn Rentgenol Radiol. 1999 Nov-Dec;(6):45-9. Vestn Rentgenol Radiol. 1999. PMID: 10714233 Review. Russian. No abstract available.
• Contrast media and pain: hypotheses on the genesis of pain occurring on intra-arterial administration of contrast media.

  Hagen B, Klink G. Hagen B, et al. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd. 1983;118:50-6. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd. 1983. PMID: 6139080 Review. No abstract available.