Elaboration of the definition of genetic counseling into a model for counselee decision-making
- PMID: 7345579
- DOI: 10.1080/19485565.1980.9988433
Elaboration of the definition of genetic counseling into a model for counselee decision-making
Abstract
PIP: Genetic counselors are generally trained in genetics only and often have no basis for determining when a counselee has made an informed decision and the counselor's function is complete. A theory of genetic counseling (GC) is offered which interrelates genetic information, psychological responses, learning theory, and decision making, reflecting a shift from a eugenic orientation to an orientation concerned with the physical and mental well-being of counselees. GC is 1st defined as enabling the counselee to comprehend the medical facts of genetic disorders, heredity, risks, and alternatives, as well as to make a healthy adjustment to a family member's disorder and risk of recurrence. The process of learning is broken down into a hierarchical relationship between acquisition, understanding, and personalization of facts, and applied to the GC situation; e.g. "the options are as follows;" "they can be exercised by couples in certain ways;" and "we have the following choices to make." Personalization of knowledge means integration into one's own value system where it will affect decisions made, a process affected by factors such as stress. Often, the information provided by GC is not the only information the counselee possesses, and it will be integrated with other conceptions. Normative social influences (e.g. a family's attitude towards abortion) affect the behavioral intention. And finally, the behavioral intention is not always equivalent to the actual behavior. These process are all related to the way in which a family deals with the stress caused by a genetic disorder. GC outcomes are easier to measure than those of psychological counseling. Extending the model to clinical application implies 1) assessment; 2) setting objectives; 3) counseling; and 4) evaluation.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of a follow-up study of genetic counseling.Clin Genet. 1980 Jan;17(1):1-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1980.tb00106.x. Clin Genet. 1980. PMID: 7389180
-
Current legal trends regarding abortions for minors: a dilemma for counselors.Sch Couns. 1983 Nov;31(2):120-4. Sch Couns. 1983. PMID: 12313169
-
Counselee participation in follow-up breast cancer genetic counselling visits and associations with achievement of the preferred role, cognitive outcomes, risk perception alignment and perceived personal control.Soc Sci Med. 2014 Sep;116:178-86. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.012. Epub 2014 Jul 6. Soc Sci Med. 2014. PMID: 25016325
-
Value neutrality in genetic counseling: an unattained ideal.Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(1):47-51. doi: 10.1023/a:1009972728031. Med Health Care Philos. 2001. PMID: 11315419 Review.
-
AIDS and the future of reproductive freedom.Milbank Q. 1990;68(Suppl. 2):179-204. Milbank Q. 1990. PMID: 11653914 Review.
Cited by
-
Clients' interpretation of risks provided in genetic counseling.Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Aug;39(2):253-64. Am J Hum Genet. 1986. PMID: 3752089 Free PMC article.
-
How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.J Genet Couns. 2008 Feb;17(1):30-63. doi: 10.1007/s10897-007-9132-1. Epub 2007 Oct 30. J Genet Couns. 2008. PMID: 17968638
-
Follow-up survey of pregnancies with diagnoses of chromosomal abnormality.J Genet Couns. 1993 Sep;2(3):139-52. doi: 10.1007/BF00962074. J Genet Couns. 1993. PMID: 24242634
-
A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.J Genet Couns. 2006 Apr;15(2):77-83. doi: 10.1007/s10897-005-9014-3. J Genet Couns. 2006. PMID: 16761103
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous