Critical frequency of photic driving in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. A comparison to pattern evoked responses
- PMID: 7356412
- DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1980.00500510038005
Critical frequency of photic driving in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. A comparison to pattern evoked responses
Abstract
Patients with known or suspected multiple sclerosis (MS) were tested for abnormalities in visual evoked potentials. We compared the critical frequency of photic driving (CFPD) with pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (PVER). We found the CFPD to be somewhat more sensitive than PVER for detecting abnormalities in the visual pathways of patients with MS. When used together, the two were complementary, each fining abnormalities that the other missed. When evaluating patients with MS with evoked potentials, both PVER and CFPD should be tested.
Similar articles
-
Steady-state and transient visual evoked potentials in clinical practice.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1982;388:290-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1982.tb50797.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1982. PMID: 6953873
-
Critical frequency of photic driving in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.Arch Neurol. 1984 Jul;41(7):752-5. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1984.04050180074021. Arch Neurol. 1984. PMID: 6743066
-
Comparison of the pattern and diffuse-light visual evoked responses in definite multiple sclerosis.Arch Neurol. 1980 Jan;37(1):30-4. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1980.00500500060008. Arch Neurol. 1980. PMID: 7350898
-
The ocular manifestations of multiple sclerosis. 1. Abnormalities of the afferent visual system.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Sep;55(9):747-52. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.9.747. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992. PMID: 1402963 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
[Electrophysiolgical diagnosis for multiple sclerosis].Nihon Rinsho. 2003 Aug;61(8):1347-54. Nihon Rinsho. 2003. PMID: 12962022 Review. Japanese.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical