Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 1980 Summer;13(2):259-73.
doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-259.

Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior

Case Reports

Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior

A E Kazdin. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Summer.

Abstract

The acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior was evaluated in two experiments. In each experiment, clinical cases were described to undergraduate students along with four different treatments in a Replicated Latin Square Design. The treatments included reinforcement of incomparible behavior, time out from reinforcement, drug therapy, and electric shock and the treatments were described as they were appliedto children with problem behaviors. Experiment 1 developed an assessment device to evaluate treatment acceptability and examined whether treatments were rated as differentially acceptable. Experiment 2 replicated the first experiment and examined whether the severity of the presenting clinical problem influenced ratings of acceptability. The results indicated that treatments were sharply distinguished in overall acceptability. Reinforcement of incompatible behavior was more acceptable than other treatments which followed, in order, time out from reinforcement, drug therapy, and electric shock. Case severity influenced acceptability of alternative treatments with all treatments being rated as more acceptable with more severe cases. However, the strength of case severity was relatively small in relation to the different treatment conditions themselves which accounted for large portions of variance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Psychol Bull. 1978 Jan;85(1):1-23 - PubMed
    1. Behav Res Ther. 1972 Feb;10(1):15-27 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Spring;7(1):93-101 - PubMed
    1. J Psychiatry Law. 1976 Summer;4(2):171-244 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Bull. 1959 Mar;56(2):81-105 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances