This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

. 1980 May;27(5):457-64.

doi: 10.3758/bf03204463.

Parafoveal word perception: a case against semantic preprocessing

A W Inhoff, K Rayner

PMID: 7383833
DOI: 10.3758/bf03204463

Parafoveal word perception: a case against semantic preprocessing

A W Inhoff et al. Percept Psychophys. 1980 May.

. 1980 May;27(5):457-64.

doi: 10.3758/bf03204463.

Authors

A W Inhoff, K Rayner

PMID: 7383833
DOI: 10.3758/bf03204463

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
Yan M, Kliegl R, Shu H, Pan J, Zhou X. Yan M, et al. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1669-76. doi: 10.1037/a0019329. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010. PMID: 20731511
Word processing in the parafoveal region.
Lee CH, Kim K. Lee CH, et al. Int J Psychol. 2009 Oct;44(5):369-77. doi: 10.1080/00207590802500208. Int J Psychol. 2009. PMID: 22029615
Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
Simola J, Holmqvist K, Lindgren M. Simola J, et al. Brain Lang. 2009 Nov;111(2):101-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Sep 25. Brain Lang. 2009. PMID: 19782390
Parafoveal processing in reading.
Schotter ER, Angele B, Rayner K. Schotter ER, et al. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jan;74(1):5-35. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012. PMID: 22042596 Review.
Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.
Simpson GB. Simpson GB. Psychol Bull. 1984 Sep;96(2):316-40. Psychol Bull. 1984. PMID: 6385046 Review. No abstract available.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Perceiving words during reading: lack of facilitation from prior peripheral exposure.
McConkie GW, Zola D, Blanchard HE, Wolverton GS. McConkie GW, et al. Percept Psychophys. 1982 Sep;32(3):271-81. doi: 10.3758/bf03206231. Percept Psychophys. 1982. PMID: 7177765 No abstract available.
Directing attention in the visual field.
Duncan J. Duncan J. Percept Psychophys. 1981 Jul;30(1):90-3. doi: 10.3758/bf03206140. Percept Psychophys. 1981. PMID: 7290900 No abstract available.
Negative priming is not task bound: A consistent pattern across naming and categorization tasks.
Chiappe DL, Macleod CM. Chiappe DL, et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Sep;2(3):364-9. doi: 10.3758/BF03210973. Psychon Bull Rev. 1995. PMID: 24203716
Early parafoveal semantic integration in natural reading.
Pan Y, Frisson S, Federmeier KD, Jensen O. Pan Y, et al. Elife. 2024 Jul 5;12:RP91327. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91327. Elife. 2024. PMID: 38968325 Free PMC article.
Early morphological effects in reading: evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew.
Deutsch A, Frost R, Pelleg S, Pollatsek A, Rayner K. Deutsch A, et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):415-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03196500. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003. PMID: 12921418

See all "Cited by" articles

References

1. Science. 1979 Oct 26;206(4417):468-9 - PubMed
1. Cogn Psychol. 1980 Apr;12(2):206-26 - PubMed
1. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981 Feb;7(1):167-79 - PubMed
1. J Exp Psychol. 1970 Aug;85(2):225-8 - PubMed
1. Psychol Bull. 1978 May;85(3):618-60 - PubMed

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions