This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

. 1980;20(3):265-9.

doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90111-x.

Speedy evoked potential methods for assessing vision in normal and ambylopic eyes: pros and cons

D Regan

PMID: 7385600
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90111-x

Speedy evoked potential methods for assessing vision in normal and ambylopic eyes: pros and cons

D Regan. Vision Res. 1980.

. 1980;20(3):265-9.

doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90111-x.

Author

D Regan

PMID: 7385600
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90111-x

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Assessment of visual acuity by evoked potential recording: ambiguity caused by temporal dependence of spatial frequency selectivity.
Regan D. Regan D. Vision Res. 1978;18(4):439-43. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90054-8. Vision Res. 1978. PMID: 664323 No abstract available.
Spatial and temporal interaction of pattern-evoked cortical potentials in human infants.
Moskowitz A, Sokol S. Moskowitz A, et al. Vision Res. 1980;20(8):699-707. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90095-4. Vision Res. 1980. PMID: 7445441 No abstract available.
Size specificity and interocular suppression: monocular evoked potentials and reaction times.
Harter MR, Towle VL, Musso MF. Harter MR, et al. Vision Res. 1976;16(10):1111-7. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(76)90251-0. Vision Res. 1976. PMID: 969223 No abstract available.
[Retinal and retinocortical conduction times in pattern stimulation of amblyopic children].
Teping C, Kamps I, Silny J. Teping C, et al. Fortschr Ophthalmol. 1987;84(5):496-9. Fortschr Ophthalmol. 1987. PMID: 2828204 German. No abstract available.
Spatial vision then and now.
Thomas JP. Thomas JP. Vision Res. 1986;26(9):1523-30. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90172-0. Vision Res. 1986. PMID: 3303672 Review. No abstract available.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Electrophysiological assessment of the human depth-perception threshold.
Wesemann W, Klingenberger H, Rassow B. Wesemann W, et al. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1987;225(6):429-36. doi: 10.1007/BF02334171. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1987. PMID: 3678854
A new method of extrapolating the sweep pattern visual evoked potential acuity.
Zhou P, Zhao MW, Li XX, Hu XF, Wu X, Niu LJ, Yu WZ, Xu XL. Zhou P, et al. Doc Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep;117(2):85-91. doi: 10.1007/s10633-007-9095-4. Epub 2007 Oct 31. Doc Ophthalmol. 2008. PMID: 17972124
Dynamic topography of pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) in psychogenic visual loss patients.
Nakamura A, Tabuchi A, Matsuda E, Yamaguchi W. Nakamura A, et al. Doc Ophthalmol. 2000 Sep;101(2):95-113. doi: 10.1023/a:1026409304135. Doc Ophthalmol. 2000. PMID: 11200549
Similarities and differences between behavioral and electrophysiological visual acuity thresholds in healthy infants during the second half of the first year of life.
Polevoy C, Muckle G, Séguin JR, Ouellet E, Saint-Amour D. Polevoy C, et al. Doc Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;134(2):99-110. doi: 10.1007/s10633-017-9576-z. Epub 2017 Feb 20. Doc Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28220265
Comparison of preferential looking acuity and pattern reversal visual evoked response acuity in pediatric patients.
Katsumi O, Denno S, Arai M, De Lopes Faria J, Hirose T. Katsumi O, et al. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1997 Nov;235(11):684-90. doi: 10.1007/BF01880666. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1997. PMID: 9407225

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Elsevier Science
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information
Miscellaneous
- NCI CPTAC Assay Portal