An iterative approach to the analysis of EM autoradiographs. II. Estimates of sample sizes and confidence limits

Abstract

The errors inherent in EM autoradiography are discussed and certain of them deemed to be of particular practical significance in the quantitative assessment of preparations. A method is described for estimating the standard errors attributable to each of several sources of variation and thence for obtaining the overall standard error value to be attached to relative activity estimates obtained in the method of Downs & Williams (1978). In an appendix, a fully worked example is given illustrating clearly the strategy of the method and the magnitudes of error estimates that are to be attached to the final specific activity values.