Patients' rights in decision making: the case for personalism versus paternalism in health care
- PMID: 7397654
Patients' rights in decision making: the case for personalism versus paternalism in health care
Abstract
The purpose of this presentation is to shine a psychological spotlight on the role of the breast cancer patient in the process of her decision making about her medical care and the specific influence that the nature of the physician-patient interaction has on that behavior. The vision of the parental physician as unilateral authority in decisions about health care is dimming. The picture is being supplanted by a new image that promotes a view of personalism and a concept of "shared responsibility." The wave of consumerism is washing the shores of medical practice, and women are establishing their beachhead. Women are demonstrating their knowledge, their competence, and their responsibility in exercising decisions about their medical treatments and the quality of their survival. Therefore, it is essential to educate patients to exhibit informed consumer behavior and encourage physicians to recognize the value of a patient's participation. Such collaborative endeavors could result in increased patient satisfaction, reduced burdens for the physician, and preserved patients' feelings of individuality, autonomy, and sense of personal dignity.
Similar articles
-
[The origin of informed consent].Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005. PMID: 16602332 Italian.
-
Patients' rights in decision making: the case for personalism versus paternalism in health care.Cancer. 1980 Suppl ): 1035-1041, 15 Aug;46(4). Cancer. 1980. PMID: 11665278 No abstract available.
-
[Shared decision making: an approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation].Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Jun;42(3):129-35. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40097. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003. PMID: 12813649 German.
-
Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys.Behav Med. 1998 Summer;24(2):81-8. doi: 10.1080/08964289809596384. Behav Med. 1998. PMID: 9695899 Review.
-
Preparatory education for informed decision-making in prostate cancer early detection and treatment.Semin Urol Oncol. 2000 Aug;18(3):172-7. Semin Urol Oncol. 2000. PMID: 10975487 Review.
Cited by
-
Preferences for pharmacogenomic testing in polypharmacy patients: a discrete choice experiment.Per Med. 2022 Nov;19(6):535-548. doi: 10.2217/pme-2022-0056. Epub 2022 Nov 1. Per Med. 2022. PMID: 36317592 Free PMC article.
-
What are the information priorities for cancer patients involved in treatment decisions? An experienced surrogate study in Hodgkin's disease.Br J Cancer. 1996 Jan;73(2):222-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.39. Br J Cancer. 1996. PMID: 8546910 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions.J R Soc Med. 1989 May;82(5):260-3. doi: 10.1177/014107688908200506. J R Soc Med. 1989. PMID: 2754680 Free PMC article.
-
Operating Ethically: A Review of Surgical Ethics in Pakistan and Recommendations for the Way Forward.Cureus. 2023 Oct 10;15(10):e46789. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46789. eCollection 2023 Oct. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37954730 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Trust in government and support for governmental regulation: the case of electronic health records.Health Expect. 2014 Dec;17(6):784-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00803.x. Epub 2012 Jul 19. Health Expect. 2014. PMID: 22809222 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical