Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1978 Dec 21;58(1):55-63.
doi: 10.1007/BF00930792.

The efficacy of anthelmintics against third stage larvae of Ancylostoma caninum in Mastomys natalensis

The efficacy of anthelmintics against third stage larvae of Ancylostoma caninum in Mastomys natalensis

G Lämmler et al. Z Parasitenkd. .

Abstract

Investigations have been carried out on the multimammate rat (Mastomys natalensis), orally infected with 1000 third stage larvae of Ancylostoma caninum per animal, to evaluate the larvicidal efficacy of anthelmintics in this paratenic host. The oral or subcutaneous administration of 19 anthelmintics and filaricides revealed good activity for levamisole, cambendazole, and mebendazole against 15-day-old Ancylostoma larvae which were located in the muscular tissue. Similarly, good results were obtained with levamisole and cambendazole against the migrating third stage larvae, by treatment two to six days after infection. The benzimidazole derivatives, thiabendazole, oxibendazole, parbendazole, and fenbendazole showed marked activity only at high dosage rates. The anthelmintics methyridine, amoscanate, pyrantel tartrate, morantel tartrate; the microfilaricidal organophosphates dichlorvos, fenthion, and haloxon; as well as the micro- or macrofilaricidal drugs diethylcarbamazine, nitrofurantoin, nifurtimox, suramin sodium, and thiacetarsamide sodium failed to show larvicidal activity even in high dosages. The average larval recovery rate after oral infection with 1000 third stage larvae, in untreated control animals, was 14.85%.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. J Parasitol. 1956 Aug;42(4 Section 1):349-62 - PubMed
    1. Br Vet J. 1970 Aug;126(8):427-39 - PubMed
    1. Tropenmed Parasitol. 1977 Jun;28(2):205-25 - PubMed
    1. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1976 Jun 1;89(11):222-5 - PubMed
    1. J Parasitol. 1976 Dec;62(6):874-6 - PubMed