Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1980 Mar;17(3):337-43.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.17.3.337.

In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activities of sporaricin A, a new aminoglycoside

Comparative Study

In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activities of sporaricin A, a new aminoglycoside

F Kobayashi et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Mar.

Abstract

The in vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activity of sporaricin A, a new aminoglycoside, was compared with that of amikacin, dibekacin, and gentamicin. Sporaricin A showed a broad spectrum of activity against various gram-positive and -negative bacteria, including amikacin-, dibekacin-, or gentamicin-resistant strains. Sporaricin A inhibited more than 90% of clinical isolates of staphylococci, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Serratia, and Proteus, except for P. morganii and P. inconstans, at the concentration of 3.13 microgram/ml. This activity, except for that against Serratia, was similar to that of amikacin. Against P. inconstans and S. marcescens, sporaricin A was more effective than amikacin, dibekacin, and gentamicin. However, its activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was relatively weak in comparison with three other aminoglycosides. Sporaricin A was highly effective against bacteria that had various aminoglycoside-inactivating enzymes and that were resistant to the other drugs tested, but it was not active against those with aminoglycoside 3-acetyltransferase-I. The activity of sporaricin A tended to be greater with a reduction in inoculum size of bacteria and an increase in medium pH and decreased slightly in the presence of 10 to 50% horse serum. The in vitro activity was confirmed by in vivo tests in experimental infections with various bacteria. Its protective effect seemed to be equal to or greater than that of amikacin or dibekacin.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Appl Microbiol. 1970 Feb;19(2):345-52 - PubMed
    1. Jpn J Microbiol. 1971 May;15(3):265-72 - PubMed
    1. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1977 Jul;30(7):533-40 - PubMed
    1. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1977 Jul;30(7):552-63 - PubMed
    1. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1977 Nov;30(11):1025-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources