Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1978 Dec;14(6):801-6.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.14.6.801.

Pharmacokinetics of mezlocillin in healthy volunteers

Pharmacokinetics of mezlocillin in healthy volunteers

T Bergan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Dec.

Abstract

Mezlocillin in doses of 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 g and carbenicillin in doses of 2.0 g were given as bolus injections intravenously to 10 healthy volunteers. For mezlocillin, dose-dependent pharmacokinetics was detected. This is reflected by a more than proportional rise in serum concentrations and a decreased total body clearance as doses were increased. Per dose unit, the areas under serum concentration curves to infinity were 33.5 mug.h/ml for the 1.0-g dose, 47.2 mug.h/ml for the 2.0-g dose, and 54.8 mug.h/ml for the 5.0-g dose. The body clearance fell from 31.2 liters/h with the 1.0-g dose to 17.0 liters/h with the 5.0-g dose. This can be explained mainly by a marked depression of nonrenal clearance, which fell from 12.2 to 3.8 liters/h, compared with a parallel change in renal clearance from 19.0 to 13.2 liters/h. Contributing to the non-linearity may be biotransformation, evacuation via bile, or another process. With dose increments, rising amounts are recovered unchanged in the urine-61% after a 1.0-g dose compared with 69% after a 5.0-g dose. This clearly defines metabolism as a major factor of elimination. Carbenicillin, for which the first-order, two-compartment open model was applicable here as in previous studies, had a longer serum half-life than did mezlocillin. For the 2.0-g doses, the former had a half-life of 1.4 h, compared with 0.8 h for the latter (calculated as if the two-compartment model were fully valid). The relative area under the curve (see above) was 76.1 mug.h/ml after the 2.0-g dose.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Jan;11(1):74-9 - PubMed
    1. Infection. 1977;5(3):163-9 - PubMed
    1. Infection. 1977;5(1):17-21 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):736-52 - PubMed
    1. Infection. 1976;4(2):25-30 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources