Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1980 Dec 13;281(6255):1597-600.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6255.1597.

Prophylaxis of infection after appendicectomy: a survey of current surgical practice

Prophylaxis of infection after appendicectomy: a survey of current surgical practice

W B Campbell. Br Med J. .

Abstract

Two hundred and eighty questionnaires were sent to junior surgical staff throughout England inquiring about their use of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis, topical antibacterial agents, and surgical drainage in appendicectomy. One hundred and seventy-five (63%) replies were received from 81 of the 87 hospitals included in the survey. Prophylactic systemic antibiotics were used by 78 surgeons (46%) when operating on a normal appendix but by 168 (99%) when the organ had perforated. Most surgeons started antibiotics before operation, but proportionately fewer did so when the appendix was gangrenous or perforated. Patients with severe contamination tended to receive longer courses of antibiotics, although the duration of administration varied considerably. Metronidazole was included in over 95% of all the prophylactic regimens and was often combined with other drugs when the appendix was gangrenous and perforated. Topical antibacterial agents were applied to the wound routinely by only 45 surgeons (26%), although 106 (61%) used them sometimes. Povidone-iodine was the agent most commonly used. Only 98 surgeons (56%) ever drained appendicectomy wounds, while 135 (77%) sometimes drained the peritoneal cavity. Evidence suggests that present methods of giving systemic antibiotic prophylaxis should continue, but that topical agents and surgical drainage are perhaps unnecessary when surgeons are confident of the efficacy of the systemic treatment used.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Surgery. 1969 Jul;66(1):97-103 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1969 Oct 25;4(5677):206-7 - PubMed
    1. Br J Clin Pract. 1970 Mar;24(3):111-5 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1971 Feb;58(2):117-9 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1971 Jun;58(6):447-8 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources