Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1980 Sep;45(3):161-87.
doi: 10.1007/BF02418996.

Significance of organ culture techniques for evaluation of prenatal toxicity

Significance of organ culture techniques for evaluation of prenatal toxicity

H J Barrach et al. Arch Toxicol. 1980 Sep.

Abstract

A discussion of the applicability of in vitro techniques now available for research in prenatal toxicology is presented. Advantages and disadvantages of the various in vitro methods (such as cultivation of preimplantation embryos, whole embryo culture, and organ culture) as applied to various problems of experimental research are described. As a typical example, the experience gained in our laboratory with the organ culture of mammalian limb buds is detailed. Various aspects of the research with this type of organ culture - e.g., different techniques of culturing, extent of differentiation achieved in culture, induction of abnormalities in culture, supplementing the system with drug-metabolizing capacities and means for quantification of the data - are discussed. It is concluded that certain in vitro techniques using mammalian embryonic tissues are very suitable tools for elucidating the mode of action of teratogenic agents, and that they may serve as a "model" for several basic processes also for the situation probably existing in humans. Such organ culture, and other in vitro methods, provide little, if any advantage over in vivo experiments if a "mass screening" of a possible teratogenic potential of chemicals (hazards for the human population) is attempted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arch Toxicol. 1976 Oct 28;36(2):169-76 - PubMed
    1. J Reprod Fertil. 1966 Dec;12(3):509-24 - PubMed
    1. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1977 Jun;298(2):93-105 - PubMed
    1. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1974;286(3):251-70 - PubMed
    1. Exp Cell Res. 1959 Jan;16(1):118-47 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources