Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1980 Oct;28(4):337-46.
doi: 10.3758/bf03204393.

Adaptation of the relative onset time of two-component tones

Adaptation of the relative onset time of two-component tones

D B Pisoni. Percept Psychophys. 1980 Oct.

Abstract

The results of three selective adaptation experiments employing nonspeech signals that differed in temporal onset are reported. In one experiment, adaptation effects were observed when both the adapting and test stimuli were selected from the same nonspeech test continuum. This result was interpreted as evidence for selective processing of temporal order information in nonspeech signals. Two additional experiments tested for the presence of cross-series adaptation effects from speech to nonspeech and then from nonspeech to speech. Both experiments failed to show any evidence of cross-series adaptation effects, implying a possible dissociation between perceptual classes of speech and nonspeech signals in processing temporal order information Despite the absence of cross-series effects, it is argued that the ability of the auditory system to process temporal order information may still provide a possible basis for explaining the perception of voicing in stops that differ in VOT. The results of the present experiments, taken together with earlier findings on the perception of temporal onset in nonspeech signals, were viewed as an example of the way spoken language has exploited the basic sensory capabilities of the auditory system to signal phonetic differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representations of three stimuli differing in relative onset time: leading (−50 msec), simultaneous (0 msec), and lagging (+50 msec).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average nanspeech (TOT) identification functions for baseline and after adaptation in Experiment 1. The −50-msec nonspcech TOT adaptor group is shown on the left; the +50-msec nonspeech TOT adaptor group is shown on the right.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Average nonspeech (TOT) identification fonctions for baseline and after adaptation in Experiment 2. The −50-msec VOT speech adaptor group is shown on the left; the +50 msec VOT speech adaptor group is shown on the right.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Average speech (VOT) identification functions for baseline and after adaptation in Experiment 3. The −50-msec nonspcech TOT adaptor group is shown on the left; the +50-msec TOT adaptor group is shown on the right.

References

    1. Ades AE. Adapting the property detectors for speech perception. In: Wales RJ, Walker ECT, editors. New approaches to language mechanisms. North-Holland; Amsterdam: 1976.
    1. Cooper WE. Selective adaptation to speech. In: Restle F, Shiffrin RM, Castellan NJ, Pisoni DB, editors. Cognitive theory. Vol. 1. Erlbaum; Potomac, Md: 1975.
    1. Cutting JE, Rosner BS, Foard CF. Perceptual categories for musiclike sounds: Implications for theories of speech perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1976;28:361–378. - PubMed
    1. Diehl RL. Feature analyzers for the phonetic dimension stop vs. continuant. Perception & Psychophysics. 1976;19:267–272.
    1. Diehl RL, Elman JL, McCusker SB. Contrast effects on stop consonant identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1978;4:599–609. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources