Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1981 Feb;193(2):150-4.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-198102000-00004.

Retained and recurrent bile duct stones. Surgical or nonsurgical removal?

Retained and recurrent bile duct stones. Surgical or nonsurgical removal?

R M Girard et al. Ann Surg. 1981 Feb.

Abstract

An experience with 69 patients who underwent 72 common bile duct reoperations for retained or recurrent choledocholithiasis is presented. The mean age of the patients was 57 years, and 35 patients had associated conditions. In this series six patients (8.3%) had minor complications and no patient developed major complications or died. Two (2.9%) patients developed recurrent choledocholithiasis. In recent years, nonoperative removal of retained stones through a T-tube by mechanical extraction or chemical dissolution, and removal of retained or recurrent stones by endoscopic sphincterotomy has gained widespread popularity. Retained or recurrent choledocholithiasis should be managed on an individual basis. Reoperation has a good success rate, low morbidity and mortality rates. It should be considered as the treatment of choice in low risk patients, in whom a retained stone cannot be mechanically extracted through a T-tube, and in patients with recurrent choledocholithiasis diagnosed after removal of the T-tube.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Surg. 1970 Jan;119(1):45-54 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1980 Mar;191(3):271-5 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1972 Jan;123(1):67-72 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1972 Apr;104(4):484-8 - PubMed
    1. Surg Clin North Am. 1973 Oct;53(5):1115-22 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources