Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Oct;56(10):490-3.

Use of subdermal contraceptive implants in a community-based family planning program. Experience after two years

Affiliations
  • PMID: 7477453

Use of subdermal contraceptive implants in a community-based family planning program. Experience after two years

M B Mittelmark et al. N C Med J. 1995 Oct.

Abstract

PIP: In North Carolina, the Rutherford County Family Planning Council obtained funds from a special grant for levonorgestrel implants for women not eligible for medical assistance benefits. The Council approved the following approaches to promoting responsible sexual behavior and preventing unwanted pregnancy: creation of an interagency council to monitor the program, education in the schools on responsible sexual behavior, establishment of an information-sharing network for social service agencies, and expanded, low-cost or free family planning services. During 1992-1993, clinicians at the county health department and in private practices inserted implants in 287 women aged 13-37 living mainly in Rutherford County but also in McDowell and Polk counties. A survey was also conducted in the public high school to obtain self-assessment and information about family planning from female adolescents. Age distribution of the acceptors of the contraceptive implants was 40% for 13-19 year olds (the initiative's target group), 34% for 21-25 year olds, and 32% for 18-20 year olds (32%). The two-year insertion rate for women aged 10-19 was 17.3/1000 compared to 20.8/1000 for women aged 20-29. The implantation rate was greatest among 18-25 year olds and lowest among women aged 26 and older. The method of payment for implantation was medical assistance in 69% of cases and a philanthropic foundation for women not eligible for medical assistance in 29% of cases. 8% had the implants removed during the study period. The leading reason for removal was psychological distress (25%), followed by headaches (20.8%), desire to conceive (16.7%), bleeding (12.5%), and medical contraindication (12.5%). The interval between implantation and removal ranged from less than 3 months to more than 12 months. 2.3% of the female high school students used implants. Among the 596 students who were sexually active, 4.2% used implants, 1.85% used a diaphragm, 27.5% used condoms, and 15% used oral contraceptives. The implant acceptors attended 65% of scheduled 3-month follow-up visits.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources