[Treatment of infected total prosthesis arthroplasty of the hip joint]
- PMID: 7478493
[Treatment of infected total prosthesis arthroplasty of the hip joint]
Abstract
With a median follow-up of 8 (1-13) years in our series, we are familiar with the entire courses in 62 infected hip arthroplasties, treatment starting between 1980 and 1986. The primary treatment was débridement with suction/irrigation in 6 cases, one-stage replacement of the prosthesis in 32 occasions and two-stage replacement in 23 cases. Only one definitive Girdlestone procedure was done. With further operations successful healing was finally achieved in all 62 hips. In 74% healing was primary, this being the case in 91% (10/11) of early and 71% (36/51) of late infections. Device-retaining procedures can be tried, particularly in early infections with low-virulence bacteria and a stable implant. One-stage revisions can be done in early and late low-virulence infections with loosening of components if bone and soft tissue are in good condition. In all other situations a two-stage procedure is recommended. As a rule, reimplantation can be done within 2 weeks. In cases with recurrent infection, replacement should be delayed for several months. As an alternative, several open débridements with reimplantation of a new prosthesis after 2 weeks can be considered. Girdlestone resection arthroplasty should be avoided whenever possible. Antimicrobial treatment is of great importance: it should be maintained for at least 3 months and in any case until 1 month after normalization of laboratory and clinical signs of infection.
Similar articles
-
[Two-stage reimplantation using spacers--the method of choice in treatment of hip joint prosthesis-related infections. Comparison with methods used from 1979 to 1998].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2003;70(1):17-24. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2003. PMID: 12764947 Czech.
-
A comparison of gentamicin-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate bead implantation to conventional parenteral antibiotic therapy in infected total hip and knee arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Oct;(295):96-101. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993. PMID: 8403676 Clinical Trial.
-
[One-stage revision operations for infection after hip arthroplasty].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Jan;22(1):5-8. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008. PMID: 18361226 Chinese.
-
[General principles of infection treatment in joint replacements].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2005;72(3):183-90. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2005. PMID: 16105503 Review. Czech.
-
[Comparison of therapeutic strategies for hip and knee prosthetic joint infection].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Aug;76(4):302-9. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009. PMID: 19755054 Review. Czech.
Cited by
-
[Soft tissue healing in infected arthroplasty].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2013 Jun;25(3):251-61. doi: 10.1007/s00064-012-0213-4. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2013. PMID: 23749310 German.
-
Cementless two-staged total hip arthroplasty with a short term interval period for chronic deep periprosthetic infection. Technique and long-term results.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2010 May;122(9-10):303-10. doi: 10.1007/s00508-010-1372-7. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2010. PMID: 20559887
-
[Revision strategy for periprosthetic infection].Orthopade. 2009 Aug;38(8):681-8. doi: 10.1007/s00132-009-1434-6. Orthopade. 2009. PMID: 19657619 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials