Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1995 Oct;173(4):1287-92.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91372-6.

Comparison of multiple-marker screening with amniocentesis for the detection of fetal aneuploidy in women > or = 35 years old

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of multiple-marker screening with amniocentesis for the detection of fetal aneuploidy in women > or = 35 years old

K D Wenstrom et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Our purpose was to compare the multiple-marker screening test with elective amniocentesis for the detection of fetal Down syndrome and other aneuploidies in women aged > or = 35.

Study design: Our database included the multiple-marker screening test (maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, unconjugated estriol, and maternal age) and genetic amniocentesis results from 1942 women aged > or = 35. A Down syndrome risk > or = 1:190 was considered screen positive. An algorithm to detect trisomy 18 was also used.

Results: The multiple-marker screening test Down syndrome screen-positive rate was 26.1% (507/1942). The Down syndrome detection rate was 75% (33/44); the trisomy 18 detection rate was 75% (3/4). However, the multiple-marker screening test detection rate for all aneuploidies was only 61%. Missed aneuploidies included trisomy 21, sex chromosome abnormalities, trisomy 13, trisomy 22, and trisomy 18.

Conclusions: The multiple-marker screening test fails to detect approximately 39% of all fetal aneuploidies in women aged > or = 35. These data should be provided to women considering prenatal diagnosis so that they can make an informed decision regarding the multiple-marker screening test versus amniocentesis for advanced maternal age.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Screening should not be compared with diagnosis.
    Kornman LH, Beekhuis JR, de Wolf BT. Kornman LH, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jun;174(6):1941-2. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70232-6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996. PMID: 8678162 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms