Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy
- PMID: 7489170
- DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800821027
Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy
Abstract
Three hundred and ten patients having elective cholecystectomy were randomized to either laparoscopic cholecystectomy or mini-cholecystectomy. There were 155 patients in each group. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was significantly more common with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (13 versus 4 per cent) and complications were significantly more frequent with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (9 versus 3 per cent). If laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successful, hospital stay was significantly shorter than for mini-cholecystectomy (2 versus 3 days respectively), but overall the hospital stay was not significantly different. Postoperative analgesia requirements were reduced and return to normal activities and to work were faster after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There was no significant cost difference between the two procedures.
Comment in
-
Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini- cholecystectomy.Br J Surg. 1996 Feb;83(2):279. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830244. Br J Surg. 1996. PMID: 8689190 No abstract available.
-
Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy.Br J Surg. 1996 Feb;83(2):279-80. Br J Surg. 1996. PMID: 8689191 No abstract available.
-
Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy.Br J Surg. 1996 May;83(5):708. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830529. Br J Surg. 1996. PMID: 8689219 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
