Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1995 Dec;96(6):1132-6.

Comparison of immunogenicity and efficacy of rhesus rotavirus reassortant vaccines in breastfed and nonbreastfed children. US Rotavirus Vaccine Efficacy Group

M B Rennels  1 , S S Wasserman, R I Glass, V A Keane
Affiliations
  • PMID: 7491235
Clinical Trial

Comparison of immunogenicity and efficacy of rhesus rotavirus reassortant vaccines in breastfed and nonbreastfed children. US Rotavirus Vaccine Efficacy Group

M B Rennels et al. Pediatrics. 1995 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether breastfeeding affected the immunogenicity and/or efficacy of candidate rhesus-human rotavirus reassortant vaccines.

Methods: A total of 989 healthy infants between 4 and 26 weeks of age were enrolled into a 23-center, prospective, randomized, double-masked, controlled study of the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of three doses (4 x 10(4) plaque-forming units) of monovalent rhesus-human viral protein 7, or G, serotype 1 reassortant vaccine, (RRV-S1) or tetravalent vaccine (RRV-TV) consisting of rhesus-human reassortant G serotypes 1, 2, and 4, and the parent RRV G serotype 3. Vaccine efficacy was compared in the breastfed and nonbreastfed children as well as seroconversion rates and postvaccination geometric mean titers (GMTs) of neutralizing antibodies to human serotypes 1, 2, 3, and 4, RRV, and immunoglobulin A to RRV. GMTs in the two feeding groups were compared with and without adjustment for age at initiation of vaccination, prevaccination antibody titers, and the age and prevaccination titer interaction.

Results: The seroconversion rates to both vaccines by one or more assays were similar for the breastfed and the nonbreastfed groups (RRV-S1, 84% and 85%, respectively; RRV-TV, 94% and 93%, respectively). There were no significant differences in postvaccination GMTs to either vaccine, measured by any serologic assay, in the two feeding groups. The efficacy of the RRV-S1 vaccine was not significantly lower among the breastfed children than the nonbreastfed children (28% and 39%, respectively). RRV-TV, which is the vaccine being further evaluated for licensure, was equally protective in breastfed and nonbreastfed infants (50% and 51%, respectively). Logistic regression analysis, taking into account differences in age at vaccination and day 1 titer, revealed no evidence of differential vaccine efficacy in the two feeding groups for either vaccine.

Conclusions: These results indicate that the RRV-TV vaccine, given as three doses of 4 x 10(4) plaque-forming units, induces similar seroresponses and protection in breastfed and nonbreastfed US children.

PubMed Disclaimer