Implementation of quality assurance and medical audit: general practitioners' perceived obstacles and requirements
- PMID: 7492425
- PMCID: PMC1239407
Implementation of quality assurance and medical audit: general practitioners' perceived obstacles and requirements
Abstract
Background: The introduction of quality assurance and medical audit has been an important development in general practice. However, the introduction of such programmes does not necessarily mean they are implemented by general practitioners.
Aim: A study was undertaken to describe the problems and requirements perceived by general practitioners in relation to the implementation of quality assurance and medical audit in general practice.
Method: Interviews were carried out with a stratified sample of 120 Dutch general practitioners. Knowledge, acceptance and application of quality assurance and medical audit activities were investigated, and perceived problems and requirements in implementing quality assurance and audit activities were explored.
Results: General practitioners in the Netherlands were generally positive towards quality assurance activities, but had little experience of carrying out such activities. The most frequently mentioned obstacles to implementing quality assurance activities concerned lack of time, colleagues' negative attitudes and fear of assessment and criticism by colleagues. Requirements for implementing quality assurance included having regular meetings with colleagues about quality assurance, having information on the aims and methods of quality assurance, having data from other practices with which to compare performance, having support in data collection, in audit in the practice and in setting up local peer review, and having financial support. The most important factor predicting the actual application of quality assurance activities was found to be knowledge of specific quality assurance activities.
Conclusion: Well-designed programmes for the implementation of quality assurance and medical audit, using a variety of different interventions, have to be developed. Such programmes should include the training of professionals in the concepts and methods of quality assurance as well as the provision of financial support for quality assurance activities.
Similar articles
-
Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Dec;12(6):622-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00630.x. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006. PMID: 17100861
-
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 14702504
-
Clinical guidelines in primary care: a survey of general practitioners' attitudes and behaviour.Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Dec;45(401):643-7. Br J Gen Pract. 1995. PMID: 8745861 Free PMC article.
-
Using referral letters to measure quality and performance in general practice.J Qual Clin Pract. 1995 Mar;15(1):45-50. J Qual Clin Pract. 1995. PMID: 7757325 Review.
-
MAAGs (Medical Audit Advisory Groups): the Eli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre.Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1993;6(3):4-8. doi: 10.1108/09526869310038415. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1993. PMID: 10131445 Review.
Cited by
-
Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit.Qual Health Care. 2000 Mar;9(1):23-36. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.1.23. Qual Health Care. 2000. PMID: 10848367 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Term perinatal mortality audit in the Netherlands 2010-2012: a population-based cohort study.BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 14;4(10):e005652. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005652. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 25763794 Free PMC article.
-
The Reasons behind the (Non)Use of Feedback Reports for Quality Improvement in Physical Therapy: A Mixed-Method Study.PLoS One. 2016 Aug 12;11(8):e0161056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161056. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27518113 Free PMC article.
-
Guideline for Care of Patients With the Diagnoses of Craniosynostosis: Working Group on Craniosynostosis.J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Sep;26(6):1735-807. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002016. J Craniofac Surg. 2015. PMID: 26355968 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A Cross-Sectional Study of Experiences and Attitudes towards Clinical Audit of Farm Animal Veterinary Surgeons in the United Kingdom.Vet Sci. 2018 Sep 28;5(4):84. doi: 10.3390/vetsci5040084. Vet Sci. 2018. PMID: 30274233 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources