Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Dec:(321):131-7.

Evolution of the quadriceps snip

Affiliations
  • PMID: 7497658

Evolution of the quadriceps snip

K L Garvin et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Dec.

Abstract

Between May 1990 and December 1992, the quadriceps snip was used to assist in the surgical exposure of the knee in 16 patients (4 women and 12 men) who underwent knee surgery at the average age of 65 years (range, 50-73 years). The original diagnoses included osteoarthritis (12 patients), traumatic arthritis (2 patients), rheumatoid arthritis (1 patient), and psoriatic arthritis (1 patient). The surgical exposure was done in the treatment of aseptic loosening of a total knee prosthesis in 8 patients, septic loosening in 2 patients, and primary knee arthroplasty in 6 patients with fibrous ankylosis. Using the Hospital for Special Surgery Scoring System, the authors rated the knees of 10 patients as excellent and those of 6 patients as good at postoperative evaluation. The range of motion was improved in all knees by an average of 30 degrees. Cybex testing revealed significant weakness of the knee in extension when compared with the contralateral normal side at test speeds of 60 degrees and 180 degrees per second but no difference compared with the opposite knee that had been replaced. In the authors' experience, the surgical technique of a quadriceps snip has been safe and simple, has not required special equipment, and postoperatively the patient's physical therapy has not had to be altered. Clinically, the quadriceps strength was very good, although weaker than that of a contralateral normal leg when measured by Cybex testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources