Antepartum surveillance in diabetic pregnancies: predictors of fetal distress in labor
- PMID: 7503197
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90645-2
Antepartum surveillance in diabetic pregnancies: predictors of fetal distress in labor
Abstract
Objective: Our purpose was to evaluate an antepartum testing program based on twice-weekly nonstress testing and amniotic fluid evaluation in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus and to weight the test components in the prediction of fetal distress requiring cesarean delivery.
Study design: During the 4-year period of 1987 through 1990, 2134 women with pregnancies complicated by diabetes underwent antepartum testing. Of these 1501 women (class A1, n = 505; A2-diet, n = 305; A2-insulin, n = 580; B, n = 71; C to D, n = 29; R to F, n = 11) were delivered within 4 days of their last test. Categoric analysis of data was performed according to diabetic class, fetal heart rate results, and the presence of decreased, normal, or increased amniotic fluid assessment. A univariate logistical regression was first conducted with cesarean delivery for fetal distress as outcome variable by use of the following variables: fetal weight and sex, diabetic class, gestational age at delivery, presence of additional indications for antepartum testing, largest vertical pocket, amniotic fluid index (summation of the four quadrants of the largest vertical pocket), nonstress test reactivity (two accelerations of > or = 15 beats/min of 15 seconds' duration), presence of decelerations (> or = 15 beats/min for 15 seconds) during the nonstress test, and the interactions of the nonstress test with deceleration, largest vertical pocket, and amniotic fluid index. Multivariate analysis was then applied to predict the best model.
Results: No stillbirths occurred within 4 days of the last antepartum test. However, the corrected stillbirth rate of the entire tested population was 1.4 per 1000. Eighty-five women required cesarean delivery for fetal distress. The factors most predictive of cesarean delivery for fetal distress (p < 0.05, odds ratio and 95% confidence interval) were a deceleration (3.60, 2.14 to 6.06), nonreactive nonstress test (2.68, 1.60 to 4.49), and the interaction of both a nonreactive nonstress test and decelerations (5.63, 2.67 to 11.9). Amniotic fluid assessment by largest vertical pocket or amniotic fluid index were not statistically significant. The multivariate analysis selected the interaction of nonstress test and deceleration as the best significant predictor for cesarean delivery for fetal distress.
Conclusion: An antepartum fetal surveillance program using twice-weekly nonstress test and fluid index assessment in pregnancies complicated by diabetes was successful in preventing stillbirth. The absence of fetal heart rate reactivity and the presence of decelerations were predictive of the diagnosis of fetal distress in labor requiring cesarean delivery. Ultrasonographic assessment of amniotic fluid volume was not a significant predictor of fetal distress in labor in the diabetic pregnancy.
Similar articles
-
Antepartum fetal surveillance and timing of delivery in the pregnancy complicated by diabetes mellitus.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;50(4):1007-13. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31815a63cc. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17982344 Review.
-
Screening for fetal well-being in a high-risk pregnant population comparing the nonstress test with umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;188(5):1366-71. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.305. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003. PMID: 12748513 Clinical Trial.
-
Variable decelerations in reactive nonstress tests with decreased amniotic fluid index predict fetal compromise.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;165(4 Pt 1):1094-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90478-a. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991. PMID: 1951521
-
Amniotic fluid index and prolonged antepartum fetal heart rate decelerations.Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Apr;79(4):558-60. Obstet Gynecol. 1992. PMID: 1553176
-
Prolonged and post-term pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jul;169(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.01.026. Epub 2013 Feb 20. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013. PMID: 23434325 Review.
Cited by
-
Antenatal testing-a reevaluation: executive summary of a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop.Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;113(3):687-701. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318197bd8a. Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19300336 Free PMC article.
-
Vascular complications in the diabetic pregnancy.Curr Diab Rep. 2015 Apr;15(4):22. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0586-5. Curr Diab Rep. 2015. PMID: 25732848 Review.
-
High amniotic fluid erythropoietin levels are associated with an increased frequency of fetal and neonatal morbidity in type 1 diabetic pregnancies.Diabetologia. 2004 Oct;47(10):1695-703. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1515-3. Epub 2004 Oct 22. Diabetologia. 2004. PMID: 15502930
-
Optimal Obstetric Management for Women with Diabetes: the Benefits and Costs of Fetal Surveillance.Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Sep 7;18(10):96. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-1058-5. Curr Diab Rep. 2018. PMID: 30194499 Review.
-
Pregnancy in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: How Special are Special Issues?N Am J Med Sci. 2012 Jun;4(6):250-6. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.97202. N Am J Med Sci. 2012. PMID: 22754875 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical