Bladder neck preservation and its impact on positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy
- PMID: 7504850
- DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90534-h
Bladder neck preservation and its impact on positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy
Abstract
To modify the bladder neck dissection during radical prostatectomy, in an effort to improve continence and diminish the incidence of anastomotic stricture, without compromising the primary surgical objective of complete cancer removal. Between December 1991 and August 1992, 50 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy with anatomic dissection and preservation of the bladder neck and most proximal portion of the prostatic urethra, thus creating a mucosal cuff for anastomosis to the urethral stump. There was tumor at the inked margin in 18 patients (36%), however, in only 3 instances (6%) was there tumor at the bladder neck margin. In no instance was the bladder neck margin the only positive margin. At a minimum follow-up of six months, all patients are fully continent during routine activities, and in no patient has an anastomotic stricture developed. Anatomic dissection and preservation of the bladder neck and proximal urethra does not compromise surgical margins. We believe this technique may play a role in preservation of continence after radical prostatectomy and probably decreases the likelihood of anastomotic stricture, by allowing for a circumferential mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis without the need for bladder neck reconstruction.
Similar articles
-
Update on bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact on pathologic outcome, anastomotic strictures, and continence.Urology. 1998 Jan;51(1):73-8. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00463-9. Urology. 1998. PMID: 9457292
-
Bladder-neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy.Semin Urol Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(1):51-6. Semin Urol Oncol. 2000. PMID: 10719932
-
Bladder neck preservation following radical prostatectomy: continence and margins.Eur Urol. 1995;28(3):202-8. doi: 10.1159/000475052. Eur Urol. 1995. PMID: 8536773
-
[Simplified vesico-urethral anastomosis after radical retropubic prostatectomy for cancer. A preliminary comparative study].J Urol (Paris). 1995;101(3):113-21. J Urol (Paris). 1995. PMID: 8558028 Review. French.
-
Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.J Urol. 1998 Aug;160(2):299-315. J Urol. 1998. PMID: 9679867 Review.
Cited by
-
Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy.Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Nov 7;18(12):99. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0745-0. Curr Urol Rep. 2017. PMID: 29116405 Free PMC article.
-
Advances in Techniques in Radical Prostatectomy.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 4;61(7):1222. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071222. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40731851 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bladder neck sparing in radical prostatectomy.Indian J Urol. 2013 Oct;29(4):338-44. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.120118. Indian J Urol. 2013. PMID: 24235797 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: positive surgical margin and urinary continence status.Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2014 Sep;9(3):362-70. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2014.45085. Epub 2014 Sep 5. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2014. PMID: 25337159 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of bladder neck mucosal eversion during open radical prostatectomy on bladder neck stricture and urinary extravasation.Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Oct;44(5):1403-10. doi: 10.1007/s11255-012-0186-0. Epub 2012 May 15. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012. PMID: 22585294 Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical