A randomised trial of three or six courses of etoposide cyclophosphamide methotrexate and vincristine or six courses of etoposide and ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). II: Quality of life. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party
- PMID: 7505104
- PMCID: PMC1968653
- DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1993.497
A randomised trial of three or six courses of etoposide cyclophosphamide methotrexate and vincristine or six courses of etoposide and ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). II: Quality of life. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party
Abstract
A total of 458 eligible patients, from 21 centres, with microscopically confirmed SCLC were allocated at random to three chemotherapy regimens, each given at 3-week intervals. In two regimens, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and vincristine were given for a total of either three courses (ECMV3) or six courses (ECMV6). In the third regimen, etoposide and ifosfamide were given for six courses (E16). Patients with limited disease also received radiotherapy to the primary site after the third course of chemotherapy in all three groups. As reported by clinicians, 59% of the ECMV3, 67% of the ECMV6 and 63% of the EI6 patients experienced moderate or severe adverse reactions to their chemotherapy. The major symptoms of disease, cough, haemoptysis, chest pain, anorexia, and dysphagia, were palliated in 63% or more of patients and the median duration of palliation was 63% or more of survival, the results being similar in the three groups. Among patients with poor overall condition, physical activity and breathlessness on admission, the proportions who improved were higher in the EI6 group but the differences were small. In all three groups, levels of anxiety fell substantially during treatment. Levels of depression were lower and showed little change. As assessed by patients using a daily diary card, the patterns of nausea, vomiting, activity and mood, associated with courses of chemotherapy were very similar in the three groups. In the EI6 group there was less dysphagia and better overall condition between courses, but these advantages need to be weighed against the inconvenience of the 24-h infusions required, compared with the 30-min infusions of the other two regimens. As reported in the companion paper (MRC Lung Cancer Working Party, 1993a) there was no statistically significant survival advantage to any of the three regimens, although the results do not exclude the possibility of a minor survival advantage with the two six-course regimens. In conclusion, there was no major clinical gain from continuing chemotherapy beyond three courses or from using the ifosfamide regimen.
Similar articles
-
A randomised trial of three or six courses of etoposide cyclophosphamide methotrexate and vincristine or six courses of etoposide and ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). I: Survival and prognostic factors. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party.Br J Cancer. 1993 Dec;68(6):1150-6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.496. Br J Cancer. 1993. PMID: 8260367 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Randomised trial of four-drug vs less intensive two-drug chemotherapy in the palliative treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and poor prognosis. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party.Br J Cancer. 1996 Feb;73(3):406-13. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.71. Br J Cancer. 1996. PMID: 8562352 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Controlled trial of twelve versus six courses of chemotherapy in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Report to the Medical Research Council by its Lung Cancer Working Party.Br J Cancer. 1989 Apr;59(4):584-90. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.118. Br J Cancer. 1989. PMID: 2540789 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The role of ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer.Semin Oncol. 1996 Jun;23(3 Suppl 7):40-4. Semin Oncol. 1996. PMID: 8711501 Review.
-
Chemotherapy with vincristine/ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide in small cell lung cancer.Semin Oncol. 1995 Jun;22(3 Suppl 7):32-41. Semin Oncol. 1995. PMID: 7610397 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of quality of life for diverse patient populations.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;40(1):87-104. doi: 10.1007/BF01806005. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996. PMID: 8888155 Review.
-
Sample sizes for randomized trials measuring quality of life in cancer patients.Qual Life Res. 1997 Mar;6(2):109-17. doi: 10.1023/a:1026481815304. Qual Life Res. 1997. PMID: 9161110
-
MRC quality of life studies using a daily diary card--practical lessons learned from cancer trials.Qual Life Res. 1995 Aug;4(4):343-52. doi: 10.1007/BF01593887. Qual Life Res. 1995. PMID: 7550183 Review.
-
Lung cancer: Biology and treatment options.Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Dec;1856(2):189-210. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 19. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015. PMID: 26297204 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 27;2013(11):CD001990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001990.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24282143 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials